微创肺减容术治疗肺气肿的疗效。

GMS health technology assessment Pub Date : 2014-10-01 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.3205/hta000117
Daniela Pertl, Alexander Eisenmann, Ulrike Holzer, Anna-Theresa Renner, A Valipour
{"title":"微创肺减容术治疗肺气肿的疗效。","authors":"Daniela Pertl,&nbsp;Alexander Eisenmann,&nbsp;Ulrike Holzer,&nbsp;Anna-Theresa Renner,&nbsp;A Valipour","doi":"10.3205/hta000117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung emphysema is a chronic, progressive and irreversible destruction of the lung tissue. Besides non-medical therapies and the well established medical treatment there are surgical and minimally invasive methods for lung volume reduction (LVR) to treat severe emphysema. This report deals with the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive methods compared to other treatments for LVR in patients with lung emphysema. Furthermore, legal and ethical aspects are discussed. No clear benefit of minimally invasive methods compared to surgical methods can be demonstrated based on the identified and included evidence. In order to assess the different methods for LVR regarding their relative effectiveness and safety in patients with lung emphysema direct comparative studies are necessary. </p>","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"10 ","pages":"Doc01"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/ca/HTA-10-01.PMC4185364.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and efficacy of minimally invasive lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Pertl,&nbsp;Alexander Eisenmann,&nbsp;Ulrike Holzer,&nbsp;Anna-Theresa Renner,&nbsp;A Valipour\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/hta000117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lung emphysema is a chronic, progressive and irreversible destruction of the lung tissue. Besides non-medical therapies and the well established medical treatment there are surgical and minimally invasive methods for lung volume reduction (LVR) to treat severe emphysema. This report deals with the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive methods compared to other treatments for LVR in patients with lung emphysema. Furthermore, legal and ethical aspects are discussed. No clear benefit of minimally invasive methods compared to surgical methods can be demonstrated based on the identified and included evidence. In order to assess the different methods for LVR regarding their relative effectiveness and safety in patients with lung emphysema direct comparative studies are necessary. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS health technology assessment\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Doc01\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/ca/HTA-10-01.PMC4185364.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS health technology assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/hta000117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/hta000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

肺气肿是一种慢性、进行性和不可逆的肺组织破坏。除了非药物治疗和完善的药物治疗外,还有手术和微创肺减容(LVR)治疗严重肺气肿的方法。本报告探讨了与其他治疗方法相比,微创方法治疗肺气肿患者LVR的有效性和成本效益。此外,还讨论了法律和道德方面的问题。根据已确定和纳入的证据,并不能证明微创方法与外科方法相比有明显的好处。为了评估不同的LVR方法在肺气肿患者中的相对有效性和安全性,有必要进行直接的比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and efficacy of minimally invasive lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema.

Lung emphysema is a chronic, progressive and irreversible destruction of the lung tissue. Besides non-medical therapies and the well established medical treatment there are surgical and minimally invasive methods for lung volume reduction (LVR) to treat severe emphysema. This report deals with the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive methods compared to other treatments for LVR in patients with lung emphysema. Furthermore, legal and ethical aspects are discussed. No clear benefit of minimally invasive methods compared to surgical methods can be demonstrated based on the identified and included evidence. In order to assess the different methods for LVR regarding their relative effectiveness and safety in patients with lung emphysema direct comparative studies are necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信