关于强迫和强迫的本质。

Modern trends in pharmacopsychiatry Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-09-20 DOI:10.1159/000351929
Sanneke de Haan, Erik Rietveld, Damiaan Denys
{"title":"关于强迫和强迫的本质。","authors":"Sanneke de Haan,&nbsp;Erik Rietveld,&nbsp;Damiaan Denys","doi":"10.1159/000351929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this chapter, we give an overview of current and historical conceptions of the nature of obsessions and compulsions. We discuss some open questions pertaining to the primacy of the affective, volitional or affective nature of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Furthermore, we add some phenomenological suggestions of our own. In particular, we point to the patients' need for absolute certainty and the lack of trust underlying this need. Building on insights from Wittgenstein, we argue that the kind of certainty the patients strive for is unattainable in principle via the acquisition of factual knowledge. Moreover, we suggest that the patients' attempts to attain certainty are counter-productive as their excessive conscious control in fact undermines the trust they need. </p>","PeriodicalId":74212,"journal":{"name":"Modern trends in pharmacopsychiatry","volume":"29 ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000351929","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the nature of obsessions and compulsions.\",\"authors\":\"Sanneke de Haan,&nbsp;Erik Rietveld,&nbsp;Damiaan Denys\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000351929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this chapter, we give an overview of current and historical conceptions of the nature of obsessions and compulsions. We discuss some open questions pertaining to the primacy of the affective, volitional or affective nature of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Furthermore, we add some phenomenological suggestions of our own. In particular, we point to the patients' need for absolute certainty and the lack of trust underlying this need. Building on insights from Wittgenstein, we argue that the kind of certainty the patients strive for is unattainable in principle via the acquisition of factual knowledge. Moreover, we suggest that the patients' attempts to attain certainty are counter-productive as their excessive conscious control in fact undermines the trust they need. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern trends in pharmacopsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000351929\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern trends in pharmacopsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000351929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern trends in pharmacopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000351929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

在本章中,我们概述了当前和历史上关于强迫和强迫本质的概念。我们讨论了一些关于强迫症的情感,意志或情感性质的首要问题。此外,我们还补充了一些我们自己的现象学建议。我们特别指出,患者需要绝对的确定性,而这种需求背后缺乏信任。基于维特根斯坦(Wittgenstein)的见解,我们认为,患者所追求的那种确定性,原则上是无法通过获得事实性知识来实现的。此外,我们认为患者试图获得确定性是适得其反的,因为他们过度的有意识控制实际上破坏了他们所需要的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the nature of obsessions and compulsions.

In this chapter, we give an overview of current and historical conceptions of the nature of obsessions and compulsions. We discuss some open questions pertaining to the primacy of the affective, volitional or affective nature of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Furthermore, we add some phenomenological suggestions of our own. In particular, we point to the patients' need for absolute certainty and the lack of trust underlying this need. Building on insights from Wittgenstein, we argue that the kind of certainty the patients strive for is unattainable in principle via the acquisition of factual knowledge. Moreover, we suggest that the patients' attempts to attain certainty are counter-productive as their excessive conscious control in fact undermines the trust they need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信