急性白血病谱系的诊断:细胞学与免疫分型的对抗

N. Ben Salah, W. El Borgi, A. Chelbi, F. Ben Lakhal, E. Gouider, H. Aounallah Skhiri, R. Hafsia
{"title":"急性白血病谱系的诊断:细胞学与免疫分型的对抗","authors":"N. Ben Salah,&nbsp;W. El Borgi,&nbsp;A. Chelbi,&nbsp;F. Ben Lakhal,&nbsp;E. Gouider,&nbsp;H. Aounallah Skhiri,&nbsp;R. Hafsia","doi":"10.1016/j.patbio.2014.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The determination of the cellular lineage in acute leukemia is a crucial step in the diagnosis and the later therapeutic conduct. In Tunisia, emerging country, some cases of acute leukemias are still treated on the basis of an only cytologic study because of lack of cytometry. Our objective is to realize a confrontation between cytology and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of AL and to analyze discrepancies.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>The study concerns 100 cases of AL. A second double-blind examination of the bone marrow smears of acute leukemias is realized by two cytologists and confronted to immunophenotyping.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In two cases of AML, flow cytometry reassigned lineage into T ALL and biphenotypic AL. In three cases of ALL the lineage was reassigned into undifferentiated acute leukemia (2 cases) and biphenotypic acute leukemia (1 case). Lineage was not established in four cases, immunophenotyping allowed the diagnosis of B ALL in 3 cases, and of biphenotypic acute leukemia in 1 case. In both cases of discrepant findings, flow cytometry allowed the diagnosis of biphenotypic acute leukemia in a case and of AML in the other one.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The cytological study remains insufficient in the diagnosis of lineage even with experimented cytologists. Immunophenotyping is essential in lineage assignment and reassignment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19743,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie-biologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.patbio.2014.05.018","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic de lignée dans les leucémies aiguës : confrontation entre cytologie et immunophénotypage\",\"authors\":\"N. Ben Salah,&nbsp;W. El Borgi,&nbsp;A. Chelbi,&nbsp;F. Ben Lakhal,&nbsp;E. Gouider,&nbsp;H. Aounallah Skhiri,&nbsp;R. Hafsia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.patbio.2014.05.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The determination of the cellular lineage in acute leukemia is a crucial step in the diagnosis and the later therapeutic conduct. In Tunisia, emerging country, some cases of acute leukemias are still treated on the basis of an only cytologic study because of lack of cytometry. Our objective is to realize a confrontation between cytology and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of AL and to analyze discrepancies.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>The study concerns 100 cases of AL. A second double-blind examination of the bone marrow smears of acute leukemias is realized by two cytologists and confronted to immunophenotyping.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In two cases of AML, flow cytometry reassigned lineage into T ALL and biphenotypic AL. In three cases of ALL the lineage was reassigned into undifferentiated acute leukemia (2 cases) and biphenotypic acute leukemia (1 case). Lineage was not established in four cases, immunophenotyping allowed the diagnosis of B ALL in 3 cases, and of biphenotypic acute leukemia in 1 case. In both cases of discrepant findings, flow cytometry allowed the diagnosis of biphenotypic acute leukemia in a case and of AML in the other one.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The cytological study remains insufficient in the diagnosis of lineage even with experimented cytologists. Immunophenotyping is essential in lineage assignment and reassignment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathologie-biologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.patbio.2014.05.018\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathologie-biologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0369811414001138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologie-biologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0369811414001138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的检测急性白血病的细胞系是诊断和治疗的重要手段。在突尼斯这个新兴国家,由于缺乏细胞术,一些急性白血病病例仍然仅根据细胞学研究进行治疗。我们的目的是实现细胞学和流式细胞术在AL诊断中的对抗,并分析差异。患者和方法本研究涉及100例急性白血病患者。两名细胞学家对急性白血病患者骨髓涂片进行了二次双盲检查,并进行了免疫表型分析。结果2例急性淋巴细胞白血病(AML)经流式细胞术鉴定为T淋巴细胞白血病和双表型白血病,3例急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)经流式细胞术鉴定为未分化急性白血病(2例)和双表型急性白血病(1例)。4例谱系未建立,3例免疫表型诊断为B型ALL, 1例双表型急性白血病。在这两例差异的发现中,流式细胞术允许双表型急性白血病的诊断和AML的另一个病例。结论细胞学研究对谱系的诊断仍存在不足。免疫表型在谱系分配和再分配中是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic de lignée dans les leucémies aiguës : confrontation entre cytologie et immunophénotypage

Objective

The determination of the cellular lineage in acute leukemia is a crucial step in the diagnosis and the later therapeutic conduct. In Tunisia, emerging country, some cases of acute leukemias are still treated on the basis of an only cytologic study because of lack of cytometry. Our objective is to realize a confrontation between cytology and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of AL and to analyze discrepancies.

Patients and methods

The study concerns 100 cases of AL. A second double-blind examination of the bone marrow smears of acute leukemias is realized by two cytologists and confronted to immunophenotyping.

Results

In two cases of AML, flow cytometry reassigned lineage into T ALL and biphenotypic AL. In three cases of ALL the lineage was reassigned into undifferentiated acute leukemia (2 cases) and biphenotypic acute leukemia (1 case). Lineage was not established in four cases, immunophenotyping allowed the diagnosis of B ALL in 3 cases, and of biphenotypic acute leukemia in 1 case. In both cases of discrepant findings, flow cytometry allowed the diagnosis of biphenotypic acute leukemia in a case and of AML in the other one.

Conclusion

The cytological study remains insufficient in the diagnosis of lineage even with experimented cytologists. Immunophenotyping is essential in lineage assignment and reassignment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathologie-biologie
Pathologie-biologie 医学-病理学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信