{"title":"家庭、员工和利益相关者如何看待孩子们的梦想实现?","authors":"Jayne Galinsky","doi":"10.3109/01460862.2014.946544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This article reports the results of a service evaluation designed to assess children's dream fulfillment charity, Dreams Come True.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>With the objective to gain the opinions of those who have used and are involved with the charity, parents (n=10), staff (n=10), and key informants (n=18) were asked what the charity does most and least well.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Focus group meetings using the nominal group technique were held for parents and staff and an email survey was sent to key informants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conclusions, in the form of voted responses to the question of what the charity does most and least well are presented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Popular themes arising from each group were the benefit of dreams, the importance of empathy, staff communication, and fundraising. Implications for the charity and third sector are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75953,"journal":{"name":"Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing","volume":"37 4","pages":"203-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/01460862.2014.946544","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What do families, staff, and stakeholders think about children's dream fulfilment?\",\"authors\":\"Jayne Galinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/01460862.2014.946544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This article reports the results of a service evaluation designed to assess children's dream fulfillment charity, Dreams Come True.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>With the objective to gain the opinions of those who have used and are involved with the charity, parents (n=10), staff (n=10), and key informants (n=18) were asked what the charity does most and least well.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Focus group meetings using the nominal group technique were held for parents and staff and an email survey was sent to key informants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conclusions, in the form of voted responses to the question of what the charity does most and least well are presented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Popular themes arising from each group were the benefit of dreams, the importance of empathy, staff communication, and fundraising. Implications for the charity and third sector are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"203-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/01460862.2014.946544\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/01460862.2014.946544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/01460862.2014.946544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
What do families, staff, and stakeholders think about children's dream fulfilment?
Background: This article reports the results of a service evaluation designed to assess children's dream fulfillment charity, Dreams Come True.
Aims and objectives: With the objective to gain the opinions of those who have used and are involved with the charity, parents (n=10), staff (n=10), and key informants (n=18) were asked what the charity does most and least well.
Method: Focus group meetings using the nominal group technique were held for parents and staff and an email survey was sent to key informants.
Results: Conclusions, in the form of voted responses to the question of what the charity does most and least well are presented.
Conclusions: Popular themes arising from each group were the benefit of dreams, the importance of empathy, staff communication, and fundraising. Implications for the charity and third sector are discussed.