多伦多疼痛管理量表-急性冠脉综合征版的内容效度。

Sheila O'Keefe-McCarthy, Michael McGillion, Sioban Nelson, Sean Clarke, Judith McFetridge-Durdle, Judy Watt-Watson
{"title":"多伦多疼痛管理量表-急性冠脉综合征版的内容效度。","authors":"Sheila O'Keefe-McCarthy,&nbsp;Michael McGillion,&nbsp;Sioban Nelson,&nbsp;Sean Clarke,&nbsp;Judith McFetridge-Durdle,&nbsp;Judy Watt-Watson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac pain and/or discomfort arising from acute coronary syndromes (ACS) can often be severe and anxiety-provoking. Cardiac pain, a symptom of impaired myocardial perfusion, if left untreated, may lead to further myocardial hypoxia, which can potentiate myocardial damage. Evidence suggests that once ACS patients are stabilized, their pain may not be adequately assessed. Lack of knowledge and problematic beliefs about pain may contribute to this problem. To date, no standardized tools are available to examine nurses' specific knowledge and beliefs about ACS pain that could inform future educational initiatives.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the content validity of the Toronto Pain Management Inventory-ACS Version (TPMI-ACS), a 24-item tool designed to assess nurses' knowledge and beliefs about ACS pain assessment and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight clinical and scientific experts rated the relevance of each item using a four-point scale. A content validity index was computed for each item (I-CVI), as well as the total scale, expressed as the mean item CVI (S-CVI/AVE). Items with an I-CVI > or = 0.7 were retained, items with an I-CVI ranging from 0.5-0.7 were revised and clarified, and items with an I-CVI < or = 0.5 were discarded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>I-CVIs ranged from 0.5-1.0 and the S-CVI/AVE was 0.90, reflecting high inter-rater agreement across items. The least relevant item was eliminated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary content validity was established on the TPMI-ACS version. All items retained in the TPMI-ACS version met requirements for content validity. Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TPMI-ACS is needed to establish criterion and construct validity, as well as reliability indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":77057,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires","volume":"24 2","pages":"11-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content validity of the Toronto Pain Management Inventory-Acute Coronary Syndrome Version.\",\"authors\":\"Sheila O'Keefe-McCarthy,&nbsp;Michael McGillion,&nbsp;Sioban Nelson,&nbsp;Sean Clarke,&nbsp;Judith McFetridge-Durdle,&nbsp;Judy Watt-Watson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac pain and/or discomfort arising from acute coronary syndromes (ACS) can often be severe and anxiety-provoking. Cardiac pain, a symptom of impaired myocardial perfusion, if left untreated, may lead to further myocardial hypoxia, which can potentiate myocardial damage. Evidence suggests that once ACS patients are stabilized, their pain may not be adequately assessed. Lack of knowledge and problematic beliefs about pain may contribute to this problem. To date, no standardized tools are available to examine nurses' specific knowledge and beliefs about ACS pain that could inform future educational initiatives.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the content validity of the Toronto Pain Management Inventory-ACS Version (TPMI-ACS), a 24-item tool designed to assess nurses' knowledge and beliefs about ACS pain assessment and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight clinical and scientific experts rated the relevance of each item using a four-point scale. A content validity index was computed for each item (I-CVI), as well as the total scale, expressed as the mean item CVI (S-CVI/AVE). Items with an I-CVI > or = 0.7 were retained, items with an I-CVI ranging from 0.5-0.7 were revised and clarified, and items with an I-CVI < or = 0.5 were discarded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>I-CVIs ranged from 0.5-1.0 and the S-CVI/AVE was 0.90, reflecting high inter-rater agreement across items. The least relevant item was eliminated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary content validity was established on the TPMI-ACS version. All items retained in the TPMI-ACS version met requirements for content validity. Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TPMI-ACS is needed to establish criterion and construct validity, as well as reliability indicators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"11-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)引起的心脏疼痛和/或不适通常是严重的和引起焦虑的。心脏疼痛是心肌灌注受损的一种症状,如果不及时治疗,可能导致进一步的心肌缺氧,从而加剧心肌损伤。有证据表明,一旦ACS患者病情稳定,他们的疼痛可能无法得到充分评估。缺乏关于疼痛的知识和有问题的信念可能会导致这个问题。到目前为止,还没有标准化的工具来检查护士对ACS疼痛的具体知识和信念,这可以为未来的教育活动提供信息。目的:检验多伦多疼痛管理量表-ACS版(TPMI-ACS)的内容效度。TPMI-ACS是一个24项的工具,旨在评估护士对ACS疼痛评估和管理的知识和信念。方法:8位临床和科学专家使用四分制对每个项目的相关性进行评分。计算每个项目的内容效度指数(I-CVI),以及总量表,表示为平均项目CVI (S-CVI/AVE)。保留I-CVI >或= 0.7的条目,修改和澄清介于0.5-0.7之间的条目,丢弃I-CVI <或= 0.5的条目。结果:i - cvi评分范围为0.5 ~ 1.0,S-CVI/AVE评分范围为0.90,反映了各项目间较高的评分一致性。最不相关的项目被删除了。结论:在TPMI-ACS版本上初步建立了内容效度。TPMI-ACS版本中保留的所有项目均满足内容有效性要求。需要进一步评估TPMI-ACS的心理测量特性,以建立标准,构建效度和信度指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Content validity of the Toronto Pain Management Inventory-Acute Coronary Syndrome Version.

Background: Cardiac pain and/or discomfort arising from acute coronary syndromes (ACS) can often be severe and anxiety-provoking. Cardiac pain, a symptom of impaired myocardial perfusion, if left untreated, may lead to further myocardial hypoxia, which can potentiate myocardial damage. Evidence suggests that once ACS patients are stabilized, their pain may not be adequately assessed. Lack of knowledge and problematic beliefs about pain may contribute to this problem. To date, no standardized tools are available to examine nurses' specific knowledge and beliefs about ACS pain that could inform future educational initiatives.

Aim: To examine the content validity of the Toronto Pain Management Inventory-ACS Version (TPMI-ACS), a 24-item tool designed to assess nurses' knowledge and beliefs about ACS pain assessment and management.

Methods: Eight clinical and scientific experts rated the relevance of each item using a four-point scale. A content validity index was computed for each item (I-CVI), as well as the total scale, expressed as the mean item CVI (S-CVI/AVE). Items with an I-CVI > or = 0.7 were retained, items with an I-CVI ranging from 0.5-0.7 were revised and clarified, and items with an I-CVI < or = 0.5 were discarded.

Results: I-CVIs ranged from 0.5-1.0 and the S-CVI/AVE was 0.90, reflecting high inter-rater agreement across items. The least relevant item was eliminated.

Conclusions: Preliminary content validity was established on the TPMI-ACS version. All items retained in the TPMI-ACS version met requirements for content validity. Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TPMI-ACS is needed to establish criterion and construct validity, as well as reliability indicators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信