Lawrence A Lavery, Javier La Fontaine, Kavita Bhavan, Paul J Kim, Jayme R Williams, Nathan A Hunt
{"title":"糖尿病足感染中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的危险因素。","authors":"Lawrence A Lavery, Javier La Fontaine, Kavita Bhavan, Paul J Kim, Jayme R Williams, Nathan A Hunt","doi":"10.3402/dfa.v5.23575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients hospitalized for diabetic foot infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed hospital admissions for foot infections in patients with diabetes which had nasal swabs, and anaerobic and aerobic tissue cultures at the time of admission. Data collected included patient characteristics and medical history to determine risk factors for developing an MRSA infection in the foot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of MRSA in these infections was 29.8%. Risk factors for MRSA diabetic foot infections were history of MRSA foot infection, MRSA nasal colonization, and multidrug-resistant organisms (p<0.05). Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of nasal colonization with MRSA to identify MRSA diabetic foot infections were 66.7% and 80.0% (sensitivity 41%, specificity 90%). Admission from a nursing home was not a significant risk factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive nasal swabs are not predictive of the infecting agent; however, a negative nasal swab rules out MRSA as the infecting agent in foot wounds with 90% accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45385,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","volume":"5 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3402/dfa.v5.23575","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic foot infections.\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence A Lavery, Javier La Fontaine, Kavita Bhavan, Paul J Kim, Jayme R Williams, Nathan A Hunt\",\"doi\":\"10.3402/dfa.v5.23575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients hospitalized for diabetic foot infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed hospital admissions for foot infections in patients with diabetes which had nasal swabs, and anaerobic and aerobic tissue cultures at the time of admission. Data collected included patient characteristics and medical history to determine risk factors for developing an MRSA infection in the foot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of MRSA in these infections was 29.8%. Risk factors for MRSA diabetic foot infections were history of MRSA foot infection, MRSA nasal colonization, and multidrug-resistant organisms (p<0.05). Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of nasal colonization with MRSA to identify MRSA diabetic foot infections were 66.7% and 80.0% (sensitivity 41%, specificity 90%). Admission from a nursing home was not a significant risk factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive nasal swabs are not predictive of the infecting agent; however, a negative nasal swab rules out MRSA as the infecting agent in foot wounds with 90% accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Foot & Ankle\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3402/dfa.v5.23575\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Foot & Ankle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v5.23575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v5.23575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic foot infections.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients hospitalized for diabetic foot infections.
Methods: We reviewed hospital admissions for foot infections in patients with diabetes which had nasal swabs, and anaerobic and aerobic tissue cultures at the time of admission. Data collected included patient characteristics and medical history to determine risk factors for developing an MRSA infection in the foot.
Results: The prevalence of MRSA in these infections was 29.8%. Risk factors for MRSA diabetic foot infections were history of MRSA foot infection, MRSA nasal colonization, and multidrug-resistant organisms (p<0.05). Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of nasal colonization with MRSA to identify MRSA diabetic foot infections were 66.7% and 80.0% (sensitivity 41%, specificity 90%). Admission from a nursing home was not a significant risk factor.
Conclusion: Positive nasal swabs are not predictive of the infecting agent; however, a negative nasal swab rules out MRSA as the infecting agent in foot wounds with 90% accuracy.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
