两种新生儿巨细胞病毒IgG抗体筛选ELISA试剂盒的比较

中华实验和临床病毒学杂志 Pub Date : 2013-10-01
Shun-Xian Zhang, Xiao-Zhou He, Shi-Wen Wang, Xiao-Fang Wang
{"title":"两种新生儿巨细胞病毒IgG抗体筛选ELISA试剂盒的比较","authors":"Shun-Xian Zhang,&nbsp;Xiao-Zhou He,&nbsp;Shi-Wen Wang,&nbsp;Xiao-Fang Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared two newborn Cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG antibody screening ELISA kits and evaluated the detection effectiveness of Abnova kit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CMV IgG antibodies were detected by both SeraQuest and Abnova kits from dried blood spot (DBS) samples of 488 newborn heel sticks. The detection abilities of these two kits were compared in different sample dilution concentrations. Relative detection effectiveness of the Abnova kit was defined by statistical method using the SeraQuest kit as a point of comparison.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Compared to the SeraQuest screening test kit, the Abnova kit revealed a sensitivity of 98.9%, specificity of 78.6%, positive predictive value of 99.3%, negative predictive value of 68.8%, and the coincidence rate for these two screening test kits at 98.3%. The consistency check of both kits based on interpretation of the kappa statistic was relatively good. For the Abnova kit, the \"area under the ROC curve\" was 0.887, which indicates moderate accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abnova kit can be applied to newborn screening for congenital CMV infections. However, repeating the test for ambiguous results is suggested to increase the specificity and negative predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":70973,"journal":{"name":"中华实验和临床病毒学杂志","volume":"27 5","pages":"392-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The comparison of two newborn cytomegalovirus IgG antibody screening ELISA kits].\",\"authors\":\"Shun-Xian Zhang,&nbsp;Xiao-Zhou He,&nbsp;Shi-Wen Wang,&nbsp;Xiao-Fang Wang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared two newborn Cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG antibody screening ELISA kits and evaluated the detection effectiveness of Abnova kit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CMV IgG antibodies were detected by both SeraQuest and Abnova kits from dried blood spot (DBS) samples of 488 newborn heel sticks. The detection abilities of these two kits were compared in different sample dilution concentrations. Relative detection effectiveness of the Abnova kit was defined by statistical method using the SeraQuest kit as a point of comparison.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Compared to the SeraQuest screening test kit, the Abnova kit revealed a sensitivity of 98.9%, specificity of 78.6%, positive predictive value of 99.3%, negative predictive value of 68.8%, and the coincidence rate for these two screening test kits at 98.3%. The consistency check of both kits based on interpretation of the kappa statistic was relatively good. For the Abnova kit, the \\\"area under the ROC curve\\\" was 0.887, which indicates moderate accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abnova kit can be applied to newborn screening for congenital CMV infections. However, repeating the test for ambiguous results is suggested to increase the specificity and negative predictive value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":70973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华实验和临床病毒学杂志\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"392-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华实验和临床病毒学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华实验和临床病毒学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较两种新生儿巨细胞病毒(CMV) IgG抗体筛选ELISA试剂盒,评价Abnova试剂盒的检测效果。方法:采用SeraQuest和Abnova试剂盒对488例新生儿足跟棒干血斑(DBS)标本进行巨细胞病毒IgG抗体检测。比较了两种试剂盒在不同样品稀释浓度下的检测能力。以SeraQuest试剂盒为比较点,采用统计学方法确定Abnova试剂盒的相对检测效率。结果:与SeraQuest筛查试剂盒相比,Abnova试剂盒的敏感性为98.9%,特异性为78.6%,阳性预测值为99.3%,阴性预测值为68.8%,两种筛查试剂盒的符合率为98.3%。基于kappa统计量解释的两种试剂盒的一致性检查相对较好。Abnova试剂盒的“ROC曲线下面积”为0.887,准确度中等。结论:Abnova试剂盒可用于新生儿先天性巨细胞病毒感染筛查。然而,对于模棱两可的结果,建议重复检测,以增加特异性和阴性预测值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The comparison of two newborn cytomegalovirus IgG antibody screening ELISA kits].

Objective: This study compared two newborn Cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG antibody screening ELISA kits and evaluated the detection effectiveness of Abnova kit.

Methods: CMV IgG antibodies were detected by both SeraQuest and Abnova kits from dried blood spot (DBS) samples of 488 newborn heel sticks. The detection abilities of these two kits were compared in different sample dilution concentrations. Relative detection effectiveness of the Abnova kit was defined by statistical method using the SeraQuest kit as a point of comparison.

Result: Compared to the SeraQuest screening test kit, the Abnova kit revealed a sensitivity of 98.9%, specificity of 78.6%, positive predictive value of 99.3%, negative predictive value of 68.8%, and the coincidence rate for these two screening test kits at 98.3%. The consistency check of both kits based on interpretation of the kappa statistic was relatively good. For the Abnova kit, the "area under the ROC curve" was 0.887, which indicates moderate accuracy.

Conclusion: Abnova kit can be applied to newborn screening for congenital CMV infections. However, repeating the test for ambiguous results is suggested to increase the specificity and negative predictive value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4549
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信