形态功能和发育模块的理论表征:颅面复合体的研究方法。

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Theoretical Biology Forum Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Vicente Dressino, Susana Gisela Lamas
{"title":"形态功能和发育模块的理论表征:颅面复合体的研究方法。","authors":"Vicente Dressino,&nbsp;Susana Gisela Lamas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modularity in biological systems is a central theme in current research. However, there are some problems related to the vague definitions of the concept of a module that impede both its empirical application and the comparison of data from different studies. In this article, we propose to characterize this concept which is consistent with the diverse ways in which it is conceptualized in the specialist literature. We test our characterization by analyzing the case study of the craniofacial complex. We conclude that the proposed delimitation allows a better understanding of modules since it differentiates between the concept of the module as a state (morphofunctional modules) and as a process (a product of ontogenetic or phylogenetic history).</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A theoretical characterization of morphofunctional and developmental modules: an approach to the study of the craniofacial complex.\",\"authors\":\"Vicente Dressino,&nbsp;Susana Gisela Lamas\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Modularity in biological systems is a central theme in current research. However, there are some problems related to the vague definitions of the concept of a module that impede both its empirical application and the comparison of data from different studies. In this article, we propose to characterize this concept which is consistent with the diverse ways in which it is conceptualized in the specialist literature. We test our characterization by analyzing the case study of the craniofacial complex. We conclude that the proposed delimitation allows a better understanding of modules since it differentiates between the concept of the module as a state (morphofunctional modules) and as a process (a product of ontogenetic or phylogenetic history).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Biology Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Biology Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Biology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物系统的模块化是当前研究的一个中心主题。然而,模块概念的模糊定义存在一些问题,这既阻碍了其实证应用,也阻碍了不同研究数据的比较。在本文中,我们建议描述这一概念,这与在专业文献中概念化的不同方式是一致的。我们通过分析颅面复合体的案例研究来测试我们的特征。我们的结论是,提议的划分允许更好地理解模块,因为它区分了模块作为一种状态(形态功能模块)和作为一个过程(个体发育或系统发育历史的产物)的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A theoretical characterization of morphofunctional and developmental modules: an approach to the study of the craniofacial complex.

Modularity in biological systems is a central theme in current research. However, there are some problems related to the vague definitions of the concept of a module that impede both its empirical application and the comparison of data from different studies. In this article, we propose to characterize this concept which is consistent with the diverse ways in which it is conceptualized in the specialist literature. We test our characterization by analyzing the case study of the craniofacial complex. We conclude that the proposed delimitation allows a better understanding of modules since it differentiates between the concept of the module as a state (morphofunctional modules) and as a process (a product of ontogenetic or phylogenetic history).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical Biology Forum
Theoretical Biology Forum 生物-生物学
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信