前全科实习生的专业选择动机——2007 - 2012年毕业生的横断面研究结果。

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2014-02-17 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000903
Jens Abendroth, Ute Schnell, Thomas Lichte, Matthias Oemler, Andreas Klement
{"title":"前全科实习生的专业选择动机——2007 - 2012年毕业生的横断面研究结果。","authors":"Jens Abendroth,&nbsp;Ute Schnell,&nbsp;Thomas Lichte,&nbsp;Matthias Oemler,&nbsp;Andreas Klement","doi":"10.3205/zma000903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The influence of a final-year elective internship in general practice (IGP) on motives affecting graduates' choice of specialty is the object of great public interest, yet still insufficiently evaluated. Longitudinal studies show the influence of numerous motives (e.g., work-life balance), but not following the IGP experience itself. Thus, we performed a cross-sectional questionnaire study of all graduates who completed the IGP in Saxony-Anhalt during 2007-2012 regarding their motives for choosing a speciality.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A standardized questionnaire was sent to 109 former interns in general practice. The questionnaire contained 29 items addressing three topics (personal attitudes, concept of personal and professional life, motives for speciality choice) and used single-choice and multiple-choice answers, as well as Likert scales. Correlation analysis was carried out by means of Kendall's tau.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire reached 97 former interns, of which 45 (46%) responded. In the overall ranking of motives for speciality choice, family (71%), leisure time (66%) and job opportunities (48%) rated as more important than income (36%), mentoring (20%), status or scientific work (20%). Only 29% of the respondents stated that their speciality choice was changed by the IGP. If the speciality choice was already established before the IGP, the influence of the IGP on speciality choice was significantly low (r = -.5; p < .01). However, if the IGP had an influence on speciality choice, it was correlated with a new perception of general practice (r = .36; p<.01). This new perception was associated with a positive influence of the medical teacher during the IGP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The final-year IGP is an opportunity to change the perception of general practice in students who are still undecided. This can lead to different speciality choices in a subgroup. Personal attitudes and concepts of personal life and career were also important factors affecting speciality choice. The aspects of the positive influence exerted by medical teachers on those students who are still undecided during the IGP should be carefully evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 1","pages":"Doc11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000903","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motives of former interns in general practice for speciality-choice--results of a cross-sectional study among graduates 2007 to 2012.\",\"authors\":\"Jens Abendroth,&nbsp;Ute Schnell,&nbsp;Thomas Lichte,&nbsp;Matthias Oemler,&nbsp;Andreas Klement\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/zma000903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The influence of a final-year elective internship in general practice (IGP) on motives affecting graduates' choice of specialty is the object of great public interest, yet still insufficiently evaluated. Longitudinal studies show the influence of numerous motives (e.g., work-life balance), but not following the IGP experience itself. Thus, we performed a cross-sectional questionnaire study of all graduates who completed the IGP in Saxony-Anhalt during 2007-2012 regarding their motives for choosing a speciality.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A standardized questionnaire was sent to 109 former interns in general practice. The questionnaire contained 29 items addressing three topics (personal attitudes, concept of personal and professional life, motives for speciality choice) and used single-choice and multiple-choice answers, as well as Likert scales. Correlation analysis was carried out by means of Kendall's tau.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire reached 97 former interns, of which 45 (46%) responded. In the overall ranking of motives for speciality choice, family (71%), leisure time (66%) and job opportunities (48%) rated as more important than income (36%), mentoring (20%), status or scientific work (20%). Only 29% of the respondents stated that their speciality choice was changed by the IGP. If the speciality choice was already established before the IGP, the influence of the IGP on speciality choice was significantly low (r = -.5; p < .01). However, if the IGP had an influence on speciality choice, it was correlated with a new perception of general practice (r = .36; p<.01). This new perception was associated with a positive influence of the medical teacher during the IGP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The final-year IGP is an opportunity to change the perception of general practice in students who are still undecided. This can lead to different speciality choices in a subgroup. Personal attitudes and concepts of personal life and career were also important factors affecting speciality choice. The aspects of the positive influence exerted by medical teachers on those students who are still undecided during the IGP should be carefully evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Doc11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000903\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:最后一年全科实习(IGP)对影响毕业生专业选择动机的影响是公众感兴趣的对象,但仍未得到充分评估。纵向研究显示了许多动机的影响(例如,工作与生活的平衡),但不遵循IGP经验本身。因此,我们对2007-2012年在萨克森-安哈特州完成IGP的所有毕业生进行了横断面问卷调查,了解他们选择专业的动机。方法:对109名全科实习医师进行标准化问卷调查。问卷包含29个项目,涉及三个主题(个人态度,个人和职业生活的概念,专业选择的动机),使用单选题和多选题,以及李克特量表。采用Kendall’s tau进行相关分析。结果:问卷共触及97名前实习生,其中45名(46%)回复。在专业选择动机的整体排名中,家庭(71%)、休闲时间(66%)和工作机会(48%)被认为比收入(36%)、指导(20%)、地位或科学工作(20%)更重要。只有29%的受访者表示他们的专业选择被IGP改变了。如果专业选择在IGP之前已经建立,则IGP对专业选择的影响显着低(r = - 0.5;P < 0.01)。然而,如果IGP对专业选择有影响,它与全科实践的新认知相关(r = 0.36;结论:最后一年的IGP是一个机会,可以改变那些尚未决定的学生对全科医学的看法。这可能导致子组中的专业选择不同。对个人生活和职业的态度和观念也是影响专业选择的重要因素。应该仔细评估医学教师在IGP期间对那些尚未决定的学生施加的积极影响的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Motives of former interns in general practice for speciality-choice--results of a cross-sectional study among graduates 2007 to 2012.

Motives of former interns in general practice for speciality-choice--results of a cross-sectional study among graduates 2007 to 2012.

Motives of former interns in general practice for speciality-choice--results of a cross-sectional study among graduates 2007 to 2012.

Motives of former interns in general practice for speciality-choice--results of a cross-sectional study among graduates 2007 to 2012.

Background: The influence of a final-year elective internship in general practice (IGP) on motives affecting graduates' choice of specialty is the object of great public interest, yet still insufficiently evaluated. Longitudinal studies show the influence of numerous motives (e.g., work-life balance), but not following the IGP experience itself. Thus, we performed a cross-sectional questionnaire study of all graduates who completed the IGP in Saxony-Anhalt during 2007-2012 regarding their motives for choosing a speciality.

Method: A standardized questionnaire was sent to 109 former interns in general practice. The questionnaire contained 29 items addressing three topics (personal attitudes, concept of personal and professional life, motives for speciality choice) and used single-choice and multiple-choice answers, as well as Likert scales. Correlation analysis was carried out by means of Kendall's tau.

Results: The questionnaire reached 97 former interns, of which 45 (46%) responded. In the overall ranking of motives for speciality choice, family (71%), leisure time (66%) and job opportunities (48%) rated as more important than income (36%), mentoring (20%), status or scientific work (20%). Only 29% of the respondents stated that their speciality choice was changed by the IGP. If the speciality choice was already established before the IGP, the influence of the IGP on speciality choice was significantly low (r = -.5; p < .01). However, if the IGP had an influence on speciality choice, it was correlated with a new perception of general practice (r = .36; p<.01). This new perception was associated with a positive influence of the medical teacher during the IGP.

Conclusion: The final-year IGP is an opportunity to change the perception of general practice in students who are still undecided. This can lead to different speciality choices in a subgroup. Personal attitudes and concepts of personal life and career were also important factors affecting speciality choice. The aspects of the positive influence exerted by medical teachers on those students who are still undecided during the IGP should be carefully evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信