心源性休克中的强离子间隙——计算似乎是错误的。

Acute cardiac care Pub Date : 2014-03-01 Epub Date: 2014-01-10 DOI:10.3109/17482941.2013.859270

Rainer Gatz

{"title":"心源性休克中的强离子间隙——计算似乎是错误的。","authors":"Rainer Gatz","doi":"10.3109/17482941.2013.859270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These formulae are erroneous and lead to predictably grossly wrong results. The authors find SIG values of mean -14 mEq/l in the non-survivors' and -10 mEq/l in the survivors' group. ' According to our data the SIG approach does not seem to add further information to usual parameters in acid-base evaluation or early risk stratification in cardiogenic shocks patients.'","PeriodicalId":87385,"journal":{"name":"Acute cardiac care","volume":"16 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/17482941.2013.859270","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strong ion gap in cardiogenic shock - the calculation seems wrong.\",\"authors\":\"Rainer Gatz\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/17482941.2013.859270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"These formulae are erroneous and lead to predictably grossly wrong results. The authors find SIG values of mean -14 mEq/l in the non-survivors' and -10 mEq/l in the survivors' group. ' According to our data the SIG approach does not seem to add further information to usual parameters in acid-base evaluation or early risk stratification in cardiogenic shocks patients.'\",\"PeriodicalId\":87385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute cardiac care\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/17482941.2013.859270\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute cardiac care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/17482941.2013.859270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute cardiac care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/17482941.2013.859270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

这些公式是错误的，会导致可预见的严重错误的结果。作者发现，非幸存者组的SIG值平均为-14 mEq/l，幸存者组为-10 mEq/l。根据我们的数据，SIG方法似乎并没有为心源性休克患者的酸碱评估或早期风险分层的常规参数提供进一步的信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Strong ion gap in cardiogenic shock - the calculation seems wrong.

These formulae are erroneous and lead to predictably grossly wrong results. The authors find SIG values of mean -14 mEq/l in the non-survivors' and -10 mEq/l in the survivors' group. ' According to our data the SIG approach does not seem to add further information to usual parameters in acid-base evaluation or early risk stratification in cardiogenic shocks patients.'

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Acute cardiac care

自引率

0.00%

发文量