欧洲移植供体风险指数在肝移植中的预后局限性。

Benedikt Reichert, Alexander Kaltenborn, Alon Goldis, Harald Schrem
{"title":"欧洲移植供体风险指数在肝移植中的预后局限性。","authors":"Benedikt Reichert,&nbsp;Alexander Kaltenborn,&nbsp;Alon Goldis,&nbsp;Harald Schrem","doi":"10.1186/1477-5751-12-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver transplantation is the only life-saving therapeutic option for end-stage liver disease. Progressive donor organ shortage and declining donor organ quality justify the evaluation of the leverage of the Donor-Risk-Index, which was recently adjusted to the Eurotransplant community's requirements (ET-DRI). We analysed the prognostic value of the ET-DRI for the prediction of outcome after liver transplantation in our center within the Eurotransplant community.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>291 consecutive adult liver transplants were analysed in a single centre study with ongoing data collection. Determination of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was performed to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and overall correctness of the Eurotransplant-Donor-Risk-Index (ET-DRI) for the prediction of 3-month and 1-year mortality, as well as 3-month and 1-year graft survival. Cut-off values were determined with the best Youden-index. The ET-DRI is unable to predict 3-month mortality (AUROC: 0.477) and 3-month graft survival (AUROC: 0.524) with acceptable sensitivity, specificity and overall correctness (54% and 56.3%, respectively). Logistic regression confirmed this finding (p = 0.573 and p = 0.163, respectively). Determined cut-off values of the ET-DRI for these predictions had no significant influence on long-term patient and graft survival (p = 0.230 and p = 0.083, respectively; Kaplan-Meier analysis with Log-Rank test).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ET-DRI should not be used for donor organ allocation policies without further evaluation, e.g. in combination with relevant recipient variables. Robust and objective prognostic scores for donor organ allocation purposes are desperately needed to balance equity and utility in donor organ allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of negative results in biomedicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1477-5751-12-18","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic limitations of the Eurotransplant-Donor Risk Index in liver transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Benedikt Reichert,&nbsp;Alexander Kaltenborn,&nbsp;Alon Goldis,&nbsp;Harald Schrem\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1477-5751-12-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver transplantation is the only life-saving therapeutic option for end-stage liver disease. Progressive donor organ shortage and declining donor organ quality justify the evaluation of the leverage of the Donor-Risk-Index, which was recently adjusted to the Eurotransplant community's requirements (ET-DRI). We analysed the prognostic value of the ET-DRI for the prediction of outcome after liver transplantation in our center within the Eurotransplant community.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>291 consecutive adult liver transplants were analysed in a single centre study with ongoing data collection. Determination of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was performed to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and overall correctness of the Eurotransplant-Donor-Risk-Index (ET-DRI) for the prediction of 3-month and 1-year mortality, as well as 3-month and 1-year graft survival. Cut-off values were determined with the best Youden-index. The ET-DRI is unable to predict 3-month mortality (AUROC: 0.477) and 3-month graft survival (AUROC: 0.524) with acceptable sensitivity, specificity and overall correctness (54% and 56.3%, respectively). Logistic regression confirmed this finding (p = 0.573 and p = 0.163, respectively). Determined cut-off values of the ET-DRI for these predictions had no significant influence on long-term patient and graft survival (p = 0.230 and p = 0.083, respectively; Kaplan-Meier analysis with Log-Rank test).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ET-DRI should not be used for donor organ allocation policies without further evaluation, e.g. in combination with relevant recipient variables. Robust and objective prognostic scores for donor organ allocation purposes are desperately needed to balance equity and utility in donor organ allocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of negative results in biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1477-5751-12-18\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of negative results in biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-12-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of negative results in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-12-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

背景:肝移植是终末期肝病唯一的救命治疗选择。供体器官持续短缺和供体器官质量下降证明了供体风险指数杠杆评估的合理性,该指数最近被调整为符合欧洲移植社区的要求(ET-DRI)。我们分析了ET-DRI在我们中心的欧洲移植社区中预测肝移植后预后的预后价值。结果:在一项持续收集数据的单中心研究中,分析了291例连续的成人肝移植。通过测定受者工作特征曲线(AUROC)下的面积,计算eurotransplantation - donor - risk - index (ET-DRI)预测3个月和1年死亡率以及3个月和1年移植物存活的敏感性、特异性和总体准确性。以最佳约登指数确定临界值。ET-DRI无法预测3个月死亡率(AUROC: 0.477)和3个月移植物存活率(AUROC: 0.524),敏感性、特异性和总体准确性均可接受(分别为54%和56.3%)。Logistic回归证实了这一发现(p = 0.573和p = 0.163)。这些预测的ET-DRI临界值对患者和移植物的长期生存没有显著影响(p = 0.230和p = 0.083);Kaplan-Meier分析,Log-Rank检验)。结论:ET-DRI不应在没有进一步评估的情况下用于供体器官分配政策,例如与相关受体变量相结合。为了平衡供体器官分配的公平性和实用性,迫切需要可靠和客观的供体器官分配预后评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prognostic limitations of the Eurotransplant-Donor Risk Index in liver transplantation.

Prognostic limitations of the Eurotransplant-Donor Risk Index in liver transplantation.

Prognostic limitations of the Eurotransplant-Donor Risk Index in liver transplantation.

Prognostic limitations of the Eurotransplant-Donor Risk Index in liver transplantation.

Background: Liver transplantation is the only life-saving therapeutic option for end-stage liver disease. Progressive donor organ shortage and declining donor organ quality justify the evaluation of the leverage of the Donor-Risk-Index, which was recently adjusted to the Eurotransplant community's requirements (ET-DRI). We analysed the prognostic value of the ET-DRI for the prediction of outcome after liver transplantation in our center within the Eurotransplant community.

Results: 291 consecutive adult liver transplants were analysed in a single centre study with ongoing data collection. Determination of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was performed to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and overall correctness of the Eurotransplant-Donor-Risk-Index (ET-DRI) for the prediction of 3-month and 1-year mortality, as well as 3-month and 1-year graft survival. Cut-off values were determined with the best Youden-index. The ET-DRI is unable to predict 3-month mortality (AUROC: 0.477) and 3-month graft survival (AUROC: 0.524) with acceptable sensitivity, specificity and overall correctness (54% and 56.3%, respectively). Logistic regression confirmed this finding (p = 0.573 and p = 0.163, respectively). Determined cut-off values of the ET-DRI for these predictions had no significant influence on long-term patient and graft survival (p = 0.230 and p = 0.083, respectively; Kaplan-Meier analysis with Log-Rank test).

Conclusions: The ET-DRI should not be used for donor organ allocation policies without further evaluation, e.g. in combination with relevant recipient variables. Robust and objective prognostic scores for donor organ allocation purposes are desperately needed to balance equity and utility in donor organ allocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信