{"title":"《异丙酚与硫喷妥钠治疗顽固性癫痫状态——仍无答案》评论","authors":"Jeffrey Buchhalter, Antonia Stang","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is a commentary on a Cochrane review, published in this issue of EBCH, first published as: Prabhakar H, Bindra A, Singh GP, Kalaivani M. Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. <i>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</i> 2012, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD009202. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009202.pub2.</p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":"8 4","pages":"1509-1510"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1930","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on ‘Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus—Still no answer’\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Buchhalter, Antonia Stang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ebch.1930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This is a commentary on a Cochrane review, published in this issue of EBCH, first published as: Prabhakar H, Bindra A, Singh GP, Kalaivani M. Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. <i>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</i> 2012, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD009202. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009202.pub2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"1509-1510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1930\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebch.1930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebch.1930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
这是对发表在本期《EBCH》上的Cochrane综述的评论，首次发表的标题为:Prabhakar H, Bindra a, Singh GP, Kalaivani M.异丙酚与硫贲妥钠治疗难固性癫痫持续状态的比较。Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012，第8期。艺术。不。: CD009202。cd009202.pub2 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.。
Commentary on ‘Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus—Still no answer’
This is a commentary on a Cochrane review, published in this issue of EBCH, first published as: Prabhakar H, Bindra A, Singh GP, Kalaivani M. Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD009202. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009202.pub2.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
