在罕见和选择性癌症适应症中招募临床试验的以患者为中心的解决方案:干草堆和针的景观。

Eric B Lynam, Jiin Leaw, Matthew B Wiener
{"title":"在罕见和选择性癌症适应症中招募临床试验的以患者为中心的解决方案:干草堆和针的景观。","authors":"Eric B Lynam,&nbsp;Jiin Leaw,&nbsp;Matthew B Wiener","doi":"10.1177/0092861512443436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Participation of adult cancer patients in US based clinical trials has remained near 3% for decades. Traditional research methodology reaches a small fraction of the target population with a fixed number of predetermined sites. Solutions are needed to ethically increase patient participation and accelerate cancer trial completion. We compared enrollment outcomes of traditional and patient focused research methodologies. A patient prioritized method (Just-In-Time, JIT) was implemented in parallel with traditionally managed sites in three cancer trials. JIT research sites were initiated after candidate patients presented, while traditional sites were initiated in advance. JIT sites enrolled with mean rates no less than, and up to 2.75 fold greater than, traditional sites. Mean patients enrolled per site was comparable (JIT-1.82, traditional-1.78). There were fewer non-enrolling JIT sites (2/28, 7%) compared to traditional sites 19/52, 37%). This retrospective analysis supports JIT as a prospective solution to increase cancer clinical trial enrollment and the efficiency of clinical trial administrative activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51023,"journal":{"name":"Drug Information Journal","volume":"46 4","pages":"472-478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0092861512443436","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Patient Focused Solution for Enrolling Clinical Trials in Rare and Selective Cancer Indications: A Landscape of Haystacks and Needles.\",\"authors\":\"Eric B Lynam,&nbsp;Jiin Leaw,&nbsp;Matthew B Wiener\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0092861512443436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Participation of adult cancer patients in US based clinical trials has remained near 3% for decades. Traditional research methodology reaches a small fraction of the target population with a fixed number of predetermined sites. Solutions are needed to ethically increase patient participation and accelerate cancer trial completion. We compared enrollment outcomes of traditional and patient focused research methodologies. A patient prioritized method (Just-In-Time, JIT) was implemented in parallel with traditionally managed sites in three cancer trials. JIT research sites were initiated after candidate patients presented, while traditional sites were initiated in advance. JIT sites enrolled with mean rates no less than, and up to 2.75 fold greater than, traditional sites. Mean patients enrolled per site was comparable (JIT-1.82, traditional-1.78). There were fewer non-enrolling JIT sites (2/28, 7%) compared to traditional sites 19/52, 37%). This retrospective analysis supports JIT as a prospective solution to increase cancer clinical trial enrollment and the efficiency of clinical trial administrative activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Information Journal\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"472-478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0092861512443436\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Information Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512443436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Information Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512443436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

几十年来,成人癌症患者在美国临床试验中的参与率一直保持在3%左右。传统的研究方法通过固定数量的预定地点到达目标人群的一小部分。我们需要解决方案,从伦理上增加患者的参与,加速癌症试验的完成。我们比较了传统研究方法和以患者为中心的研究方法的入组结果。在三个癌症试验中,患者优先方法(准时制,JIT)与传统管理地点并行实施。JIT研究地点在候选患者出现后启动,而传统地点则提前启动。JIT站点的平均注册率不低于传统站点,最高可达2.75倍。每个站点入组的平均患者数相当(JIT-1.82,传统-1.78)。与传统网站(19/ 52,37 %)相比,非注册JIT网站(2/ 28,7 %)较少。这一回顾性分析支持JIT作为一个前瞻性的解决方案,以增加癌症临床试验登记和临床试验管理活动的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Patient Focused Solution for Enrolling Clinical Trials in Rare and Selective Cancer Indications: A Landscape of Haystacks and Needles.

Participation of adult cancer patients in US based clinical trials has remained near 3% for decades. Traditional research methodology reaches a small fraction of the target population with a fixed number of predetermined sites. Solutions are needed to ethically increase patient participation and accelerate cancer trial completion. We compared enrollment outcomes of traditional and patient focused research methodologies. A patient prioritized method (Just-In-Time, JIT) was implemented in parallel with traditionally managed sites in three cancer trials. JIT research sites were initiated after candidate patients presented, while traditional sites were initiated in advance. JIT sites enrolled with mean rates no less than, and up to 2.75 fold greater than, traditional sites. Mean patients enrolled per site was comparable (JIT-1.82, traditional-1.78). There were fewer non-enrolling JIT sites (2/28, 7%) compared to traditional sites 19/52, 37%). This retrospective analysis supports JIT as a prospective solution to increase cancer clinical trial enrollment and the efficiency of clinical trial administrative activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Information Journal
Drug Information Journal 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信