快速生物物理剖面在巴西圣保罗一所大学医院高危妊娠产前胎儿健康评估中的适用性:初步结果。

ISRN obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2013-06-27 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/329542
Jonathan Mamber Czeresnia, Edward Araujo Júnior, Eduardo Cordioli, Wellington P Martins, Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza, Antonio Fernandes Moron
{"title":"快速生物物理剖面在巴西圣保罗一所大学医院高危妊娠产前胎儿健康评估中的适用性:初步结果。","authors":"Jonathan Mamber Czeresnia,&nbsp;Edward Araujo Júnior,&nbsp;Eduardo Cordioli,&nbsp;Wellington P Martins,&nbsp;Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza,&nbsp;Antonio Fernandes Moron","doi":"10.1155/2013/329542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective. To evaluate the clinical applicability of the rapid biophysical profile (rBPP), comparing results of the rBPP to umbilical cord pH values and Apgar scores. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 37 pregnant women from our high-risk service. All of them gave birth at our institution. rBPP was conducted up to 24 h prior to delivery and pH values were obtained from the umbilical vein immediately after birth. The mean and standard deviations for maternal age, gestational age at birth, pH values, and Apgar score in the 1st and 5th minutes after birth were calculated. An unpaired Student's t-test was applied to evaluate the correlation between these variables and rBPP scores of 2 and 4. Results. rBPP score of 2 was observed in 8 patients (21.6%) and score 4 was observed in 29 cases (78.4%). No patients received score zero. The difference between the Apgar scores of the rBPP score 2 and 4 was statistically significant (P < 0.01) while the same was not true with the umbilical cord pH (P = 0.08), even though the values tended to be lower in the rBPP 2 group. Conclusion. The rBPP is a fast and practical method of assessment of antepartum fetal well-being. Further studies, with a larger number of patients, are necessary to evaluate the applicability of the method. </p>","PeriodicalId":73520,"journal":{"name":"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"329542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/329542","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of the rapid biophysical profile in antepartum fetal well-being assessment in high-risk pregnancies from a university hospital in são paulo, Brazil: preliminary results.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Mamber Czeresnia,&nbsp;Edward Araujo Júnior,&nbsp;Eduardo Cordioli,&nbsp;Wellington P Martins,&nbsp;Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza,&nbsp;Antonio Fernandes Moron\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/329542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective. To evaluate the clinical applicability of the rapid biophysical profile (rBPP), comparing results of the rBPP to umbilical cord pH values and Apgar scores. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 37 pregnant women from our high-risk service. All of them gave birth at our institution. rBPP was conducted up to 24 h prior to delivery and pH values were obtained from the umbilical vein immediately after birth. The mean and standard deviations for maternal age, gestational age at birth, pH values, and Apgar score in the 1st and 5th minutes after birth were calculated. An unpaired Student's t-test was applied to evaluate the correlation between these variables and rBPP scores of 2 and 4. Results. rBPP score of 2 was observed in 8 patients (21.6%) and score 4 was observed in 29 cases (78.4%). No patients received score zero. The difference between the Apgar scores of the rBPP score 2 and 4 was statistically significant (P < 0.01) while the same was not true with the umbilical cord pH (P = 0.08), even though the values tended to be lower in the rBPP 2 group. Conclusion. The rBPP is a fast and practical method of assessment of antepartum fetal well-being. Further studies, with a larger number of patients, are necessary to evaluate the applicability of the method. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"329542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/329542\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/329542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/329542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目标。为了评估快速生物物理特征(rBPP)的临床适用性,将rBPP结果与脐带pH值和Apgar评分进行比较。方法。我们对37名高危服务部门的孕妇进行了横断面研究。她们都是在我们医院生的孩子。rBPP在分娩前24小时进行,并在出生后立即从脐静脉获得pH值。计算出生后1分钟和5分钟的产妇年龄、出生时胎龄、pH值和Apgar评分的平均值和标准差。应用非配对学生t检验来评估这些变量与rBPP得分2和4之间的相关性。结果。rBPP评分2分8例(21.6%),4分29例(78.4%)。无患者得分为0分。rBPP评分2分与4分的Apgar评分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01),而脐带pH值差异无统计学意义(P = 0.08),尽管rBPP评分2分有降低的趋势。结论。rBPP是一种快速实用的产前胎儿健康评估方法。需要更多患者的进一步研究来评估该方法的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Applicability of the rapid biophysical profile in antepartum fetal well-being assessment in high-risk pregnancies from a university hospital in são paulo, Brazil: preliminary results.

Applicability of the rapid biophysical profile in antepartum fetal well-being assessment in high-risk pregnancies from a university hospital in são paulo, Brazil: preliminary results.

Objective. To evaluate the clinical applicability of the rapid biophysical profile (rBPP), comparing results of the rBPP to umbilical cord pH values and Apgar scores. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 37 pregnant women from our high-risk service. All of them gave birth at our institution. rBPP was conducted up to 24 h prior to delivery and pH values were obtained from the umbilical vein immediately after birth. The mean and standard deviations for maternal age, gestational age at birth, pH values, and Apgar score in the 1st and 5th minutes after birth were calculated. An unpaired Student's t-test was applied to evaluate the correlation between these variables and rBPP scores of 2 and 4. Results. rBPP score of 2 was observed in 8 patients (21.6%) and score 4 was observed in 29 cases (78.4%). No patients received score zero. The difference between the Apgar scores of the rBPP score 2 and 4 was statistically significant (P < 0.01) while the same was not true with the umbilical cord pH (P = 0.08), even though the values tended to be lower in the rBPP 2 group. Conclusion. The rBPP is a fast and practical method of assessment of antepartum fetal well-being. Further studies, with a larger number of patients, are necessary to evaluate the applicability of the method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信