电子胎儿监护:辩护律师的观点。

Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology Pub Date : 2012-01-01
Thomas P Sartwelle
{"title":"电子胎儿监护:辩护律师的观点。","authors":"Thomas P Sartwelle","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has been used for four decades, after its introduction without clinical trials. EFM spawned a birth injury litigation crisis centered on the myth that it predicts cerebral palsy (CP). The myth has resulted in lottery-like judgments against physicians. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and sister organizations worldwide have the power to halt EFM's clinical proliferation and the undeserved litigation verdicts against physicians unjustly blamed for causing CP. This power has been unused. If ACOG and other organizations would declare EFM unreliable, it could change the clinical standard of care and alleviate the CP-EFM malpractice lottery.</p>","PeriodicalId":21170,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology","volume":"5 3-4","pages":"e121-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3594858/pdf/RIOG005003_e121.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Fetal Monitoring: A Defense Lawyer's View.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas P Sartwelle\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has been used for four decades, after its introduction without clinical trials. EFM spawned a birth injury litigation crisis centered on the myth that it predicts cerebral palsy (CP). The myth has resulted in lottery-like judgments against physicians. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and sister organizations worldwide have the power to halt EFM's clinical proliferation and the undeserved litigation verdicts against physicians unjustly blamed for causing CP. This power has been unused. If ACOG and other organizations would declare EFM unreliable, it could change the clinical standard of care and alleviate the CP-EFM malpractice lottery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology\",\"volume\":\"5 3-4\",\"pages\":\"e121-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3594858/pdf/RIOG005003_e121.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子胎儿监护(EFM)在没有临床试验的情况下推出,已经使用了40年。EFM引发了一场以它能预测脑瘫(CP)的神话为中心的出生伤害诉讼危机。这个神话导致了对医生的类似彩票的判断。美国妇产科医师大会(ACOG)和世界各地的姐妹组织有权力阻止EFM的临床扩散和对医生不公正地指责导致CP的不应有的诉讼判决。这种权力尚未使用。如果ACOG和其他组织宣布EFM不可靠,它可能会改变临床护理标准,并减轻CP-EFM的医疗事故。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electronic Fetal Monitoring: A Defense Lawyer's View.

Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has been used for four decades, after its introduction without clinical trials. EFM spawned a birth injury litigation crisis centered on the myth that it predicts cerebral palsy (CP). The myth has resulted in lottery-like judgments against physicians. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and sister organizations worldwide have the power to halt EFM's clinical proliferation and the undeserved litigation verdicts against physicians unjustly blamed for causing CP. This power has been unused. If ACOG and other organizations would declare EFM unreliable, it could change the clinical standard of care and alleviate the CP-EFM malpractice lottery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信