以人为中心的皮肤病学自我保健指数:一个工具,以衡量教育和支持需要的长期皮肤病患者。

Fiona Cowdell, Steven J Ersser, Coleen Gradwell, Peter W Thomas
{"title":"以人为中心的皮肤病学自我保健指数:一个工具,以衡量教育和支持需要的长期皮肤病患者。","authors":"Fiona Cowdell,&nbsp;Steven J Ersser,&nbsp;Coleen Gradwell,&nbsp;Peter W Thomas","doi":"10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Person-Centered Dermatology Self-Care Index (PeDeSI) as a tool for clinical assessment and for potential use in research evaluation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>To date, no validated assessment measures exist to identify the education and support needs of patients living with long-term dermatological conditions and to enable them to self-manage as effectively as possible. The PeDeSI assessment tool was developed to meet this need using the self-efficacy construct and a model of concordance within prescribing practice. In total, 200 copies of the PeDeSI were distributed for validation, and 145 (72.5%) were returned completed. Data were analyzed using statistical software. Frequency distributions of all items were examined, and internal consistency was summarized using Cronbach α. Exploratory factor analysis was used to disclose any underlying structure among the data items. SETTING Three specialist dermatology centers in acute care hospitals.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Dermatology specialist nurses treating patients with chronic dermatoses.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A PeDeSI was completed with each patient during his or her usual outpatient consultation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Cronbach α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach α was 0.90, indicating good internal consistency. Eliminating individual items in turn made little difference in Cronbach α (range, 0.89-0.90). Item total correlations ranged from 0.44 to 0.76 (median, 0.68). Exploratory factor analysis extracted just one factor (eigenvalue, 5.37), with no other factors having eigenvalues exceeding 1.00. Factor loadings on individual items ranged from 0.47 to 0.80. CONCLUSION The PeDeSI is a valid, reliable, and clinically practical tool to systematically assess the education and support needs of patients with long-term dermatological conditions and to promote treatment concordance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8175,"journal":{"name":"Archives of dermatology","volume":"148 11","pages":"1251-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1892","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Person-Centered Dermatology Self-Care Index: a tool to measure education and support needs of patients with long-term skin conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Cowdell,&nbsp;Steven J Ersser,&nbsp;Coleen Gradwell,&nbsp;Peter W Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Person-Centered Dermatology Self-Care Index (PeDeSI) as a tool for clinical assessment and for potential use in research evaluation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>To date, no validated assessment measures exist to identify the education and support needs of patients living with long-term dermatological conditions and to enable them to self-manage as effectively as possible. The PeDeSI assessment tool was developed to meet this need using the self-efficacy construct and a model of concordance within prescribing practice. In total, 200 copies of the PeDeSI were distributed for validation, and 145 (72.5%) were returned completed. Data were analyzed using statistical software. Frequency distributions of all items were examined, and internal consistency was summarized using Cronbach α. Exploratory factor analysis was used to disclose any underlying structure among the data items. SETTING Three specialist dermatology centers in acute care hospitals.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Dermatology specialist nurses treating patients with chronic dermatoses.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A PeDeSI was completed with each patient during his or her usual outpatient consultation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Cronbach α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach α was 0.90, indicating good internal consistency. Eliminating individual items in turn made little difference in Cronbach α (range, 0.89-0.90). Item total correlations ranged from 0.44 to 0.76 (median, 0.68). Exploratory factor analysis extracted just one factor (eigenvalue, 5.37), with no other factors having eigenvalues exceeding 1.00. Factor loadings on individual items ranged from 0.47 to 0.80. CONCLUSION The PeDeSI is a valid, reliable, and clinically practical tool to systematically assess the education and support needs of patients with long-term dermatological conditions and to promote treatment concordance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of dermatology\",\"volume\":\"148 11\",\"pages\":\"1251-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1892\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:验证以人为中心的皮肤病学自我护理指数(PeDeSI)作为临床评估和研究评估的潜在工具。设计:到目前为止,还没有有效的评估措施来确定长期皮肤病患者的教育和支持需求,并使他们能够尽可能有效地自我管理。PeDeSI评估工具是为了满足这一需求而开发的,使用自我效能结构和处方实践中的一致性模型。总共分发了200份PeDeSI用于验证,145份(72.5%)完成返回。采用统计软件对数据进行分析。检查所有项目的频率分布,并使用Cronbach α来总结内部一致性。探索性因子分析用于揭示数据项之间的潜在结构。三个专科皮肤科中心在急症护理医院。参与者:皮肤科专科护士治疗慢性皮肤病患者。干预措施:在每位患者的常规门诊会诊期间完成PeDeSI。主要结局指标:Cronbach α。结果:Cronbach α为0.90,内部一致性较好。依次消除个别项目对Cronbach α的影响不大(范围0.89-0.90)。项目总相关性范围为0.44 ~ 0.76(中位数0.68)。探索性因子分析只提取了一个因子(特征值,5.37),没有其他因子的特征值超过1.00。个别项目的因子负荷从0.47到0.80不等。结论PeDeSI是一种有效、可靠、临床实用的工具,可以系统地评估长期皮肤病患者的教育和支持需求,促进治疗的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Person-Centered Dermatology Self-Care Index: a tool to measure education and support needs of patients with long-term skin conditions.

Objective: To validate the Person-Centered Dermatology Self-Care Index (PeDeSI) as a tool for clinical assessment and for potential use in research evaluation.

Design: To date, no validated assessment measures exist to identify the education and support needs of patients living with long-term dermatological conditions and to enable them to self-manage as effectively as possible. The PeDeSI assessment tool was developed to meet this need using the self-efficacy construct and a model of concordance within prescribing practice. In total, 200 copies of the PeDeSI were distributed for validation, and 145 (72.5%) were returned completed. Data were analyzed using statistical software. Frequency distributions of all items were examined, and internal consistency was summarized using Cronbach α. Exploratory factor analysis was used to disclose any underlying structure among the data items. SETTING Three specialist dermatology centers in acute care hospitals.

Participants: Dermatology specialist nurses treating patients with chronic dermatoses.

Intervention: A PeDeSI was completed with each patient during his or her usual outpatient consultation.

Main outcome measure: Cronbach α.

Results: Cronbach α was 0.90, indicating good internal consistency. Eliminating individual items in turn made little difference in Cronbach α (range, 0.89-0.90). Item total correlations ranged from 0.44 to 0.76 (median, 0.68). Exploratory factor analysis extracted just one factor (eigenvalue, 5.37), with no other factors having eigenvalues exceeding 1.00. Factor loadings on individual items ranged from 0.47 to 0.80. CONCLUSION The PeDeSI is a valid, reliable, and clinically practical tool to systematically assess the education and support needs of patients with long-term dermatological conditions and to promote treatment concordance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of dermatology
Archives of dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信