利用人体胃肠道结肠扩展模型体外评估溴化阻燃剂在室内粉尘中的生物可及性。

Journal of Environmental Monitoring Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-16 DOI:10.1039/c2em30690e
Mohamed Abou-Elwafa Abdallah, Emma Tilston, Stuart Harrad, Chris Collins
{"title":"利用人体胃肠道结肠扩展模型体外评估溴化阻燃剂在室内粉尘中的生物可及性。","authors":"Mohamed Abou-Elwafa Abdallah,&nbsp;Emma Tilston,&nbsp;Stuart Harrad,&nbsp;Chris Collins","doi":"10.1039/c2em30690e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An in vitro colon extended physiologically based extraction test (CEPBET) which incorporates human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) parameters (including pH and chemistry, solid-to-fluid ratio, mixing and emptying rates) was applied for the first time to study the bioaccessibility of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) from the 3 main GIT compartments (stomach, small intestine and colon) following ingestion of indoor dust. Results revealed the bioaccessibility of γ-HBCD (72%) was less than that for α- and β-isomers (92% and 80% respectively) which may be attributed to the lower aqueous solubility of the γ-isomer (2 μg L⁻¹) compared to the α- and β-isomers (45 and 15 μg L⁻¹ respectively). No significant change in the enantiomeric fractions of HBCDs was observed in any of the studied samples. However, this does not completely exclude the possibility of in vivo enantioselective absorption of HBCDs, as the GIT cell lining and bacterial flora--which may act enantioselectively--are not included in the current CE-PBET model. While TBBP-A was almost completely (94%) bioaccessible, BDE-209 was the least (14%) bioaccessible of the studied BFRs. Bioaccessibility of tri-hepta BDEs ranged from 32-58%. No decrease in the bioaccessibility with increasing level of bromination was observed in the studied PBDEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/c2em30690e","citationCount":"57","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro assessment of the bioaccessibility of brominated flame retardants in indoor dust using a colon extended model of the human gastrointestinal tract.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abou-Elwafa Abdallah,&nbsp;Emma Tilston,&nbsp;Stuart Harrad,&nbsp;Chris Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/c2em30690e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An in vitro colon extended physiologically based extraction test (CEPBET) which incorporates human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) parameters (including pH and chemistry, solid-to-fluid ratio, mixing and emptying rates) was applied for the first time to study the bioaccessibility of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) from the 3 main GIT compartments (stomach, small intestine and colon) following ingestion of indoor dust. Results revealed the bioaccessibility of γ-HBCD (72%) was less than that for α- and β-isomers (92% and 80% respectively) which may be attributed to the lower aqueous solubility of the γ-isomer (2 μg L⁻¹) compared to the α- and β-isomers (45 and 15 μg L⁻¹ respectively). No significant change in the enantiomeric fractions of HBCDs was observed in any of the studied samples. However, this does not completely exclude the possibility of in vivo enantioselective absorption of HBCDs, as the GIT cell lining and bacterial flora--which may act enantioselectively--are not included in the current CE-PBET model. While TBBP-A was almost completely (94%) bioaccessible, BDE-209 was the least (14%) bioaccessible of the studied BFRs. Bioaccessibility of tri-hepta BDEs ranged from 32-58%. No decrease in the bioaccessibility with increasing level of bromination was observed in the studied PBDEs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Monitoring\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/c2em30690e\",\"citationCount\":\"57\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30690e\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/11/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30690e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

摘要

首次采用体外结肠扩展生理提取试验(CEPBET),结合人体胃肠道(GIT)参数(包括pH和化学、固液比、混合和排空率),研究溴化阻燃剂(BFRs)在人体胃肠道(GIT) 3个主要隔室(胃、小肠和结肠)摄入室内粉尘后的生物可及性。结果显示,γ-HBCD的生物可及性(72%)低于α-和β-异构体(分别为92%和80%),这可能是由于γ-异构体(2 μg L⁻¹)的水溶性低于α-和β-异构体(分别为45和15 μg L⁻¹)。在所有研究样本中均未观察到hbcd对映体组分的显著变化。然而,这并不能完全排除hbcd在体内对映选择性吸收的可能性,因为GIT细胞壁和细菌菌群(可能对映选择性起作用)不包括在当前的CE-PBET模型中。虽然TBBP-A几乎完全(94%)具有生物可达性,但BDE-209的生物可达性最低(14%)。三庚二苯醚的生物可及性在32 ~ 58%之间。所研究的多溴联苯醚的生物可及性没有随着溴化水平的增加而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro assessment of the bioaccessibility of brominated flame retardants in indoor dust using a colon extended model of the human gastrointestinal tract.

An in vitro colon extended physiologically based extraction test (CEPBET) which incorporates human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) parameters (including pH and chemistry, solid-to-fluid ratio, mixing and emptying rates) was applied for the first time to study the bioaccessibility of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) from the 3 main GIT compartments (stomach, small intestine and colon) following ingestion of indoor dust. Results revealed the bioaccessibility of γ-HBCD (72%) was less than that for α- and β-isomers (92% and 80% respectively) which may be attributed to the lower aqueous solubility of the γ-isomer (2 μg L⁻¹) compared to the α- and β-isomers (45 and 15 μg L⁻¹ respectively). No significant change in the enantiomeric fractions of HBCDs was observed in any of the studied samples. However, this does not completely exclude the possibility of in vivo enantioselective absorption of HBCDs, as the GIT cell lining and bacterial flora--which may act enantioselectively--are not included in the current CE-PBET model. While TBBP-A was almost completely (94%) bioaccessible, BDE-209 was the least (14%) bioaccessible of the studied BFRs. Bioaccessibility of tri-hepta BDEs ranged from 32-58%. No decrease in the bioaccessibility with increasing level of bromination was observed in the studied PBDEs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Monitoring
Journal of Environmental Monitoring 环境科学-分析化学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信