法医远程精神病学:南非可能的解决方案?

M Mars, S Ramlall, S Kaliski
{"title":"法医远程精神病学:南非可能的解决方案?","authors":"M Mars,&nbsp;S Ramlall,&nbsp;S Kaliski","doi":"10.4314/ajpsy.v15i4.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>South Africa has a shortage of facilities and psychiatrists to assess adjudicative competence of prisoners awaiting assessment under sections 77 to 79 of the Criminal Procedures Act of 1977. Various solutions have been proposed by the Department of Health. The recent linking of a Magistrate's court and a prison by videoconferencing offers the opportunity to implement a forensic telepsychiatry service. The literature on forensic telepsychiatry for assessment of adjudicative competence was reviewed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl and Google Scholar were searched for papers on forensic telepsychiatry. The inclusion criterion was papers reporting the use of videoconferencing for assessment of adjudicative competence or for assessment for referral out of the judicial system, by psychiatrists or psychologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>411 papers were found of which 13, published between 1997 and 2008 were relevant. The use of videoconferencing for forensic psychiatric assessment was reported from four countries. The courts in those jurisdictions have accepted the use of videoconferencing for assessment and no successful appeals have been mounted on the basis of the use of videoconferencing for assessment. User satisfaction has not been reported for assessing adjudicative competence. Forensic telepsychiatry has been found to be cost effective, improve access to scarce specialist skills and reduce transport of prisoners under guard to hospitals or psychiatrists to prisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is nothing in the literature to suggest that a forensic telepsychiatry service is not feasible in South Africa and a pilot project is being planned.</p>","PeriodicalId":55549,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"15 4","pages":"244-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/ajpsy.v15i4.31","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forensic telepsychiatry: a possible solution for South Africa?\",\"authors\":\"M Mars,&nbsp;S Ramlall,&nbsp;S Kaliski\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ajpsy.v15i4.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>South Africa has a shortage of facilities and psychiatrists to assess adjudicative competence of prisoners awaiting assessment under sections 77 to 79 of the Criminal Procedures Act of 1977. Various solutions have been proposed by the Department of Health. The recent linking of a Magistrate's court and a prison by videoconferencing offers the opportunity to implement a forensic telepsychiatry service. The literature on forensic telepsychiatry for assessment of adjudicative competence was reviewed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl and Google Scholar were searched for papers on forensic telepsychiatry. The inclusion criterion was papers reporting the use of videoconferencing for assessment of adjudicative competence or for assessment for referral out of the judicial system, by psychiatrists or psychologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>411 papers were found of which 13, published between 1997 and 2008 were relevant. The use of videoconferencing for forensic psychiatric assessment was reported from four countries. The courts in those jurisdictions have accepted the use of videoconferencing for assessment and no successful appeals have been mounted on the basis of the use of videoconferencing for assessment. User satisfaction has not been reported for assessing adjudicative competence. Forensic telepsychiatry has been found to be cost effective, improve access to scarce specialist skills and reduce transport of prisoners under guard to hospitals or psychiatrists to prisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is nothing in the literature to suggest that a forensic telepsychiatry service is not feasible in South Africa and a pilot project is being planned.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"244-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/ajpsy.v15i4.31\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajpsy.v15i4.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajpsy.v15i4.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

目标:南非缺乏评估根据1977年《刑事诉讼法》第77至79条等待评估的囚犯的审判能力的设施和精神科医生。卫生部提出了各种解决办法。最近通过视频会议将地方法院和监狱联系起来,为实施法医远程精神病学服务提供了机会。本文回顾了司法远距精神病学在审判能力评估方面的研究成果。方法:检索电子数据库PubMed、Scopus、Cinahl和Google Scholar中有关法医远程精神病学的论文。纳入标准是报告精神病医生或心理学家使用视像会议评估审判能力或评估转介司法系统以外的文件。结果:共发现论文411篇,其中相关文献13篇,发表时间为1997 ~ 2008年。有四个国家报告了利用视频会议进行法医精神病学评估的情况。这些司法管辖区的法院已接受使用视像会议进行评估,并没有因使用视像会议进行评估而提出成功的上诉。用户满意度尚未被用于评估裁判能力。人们发现法医远程精神病学具有成本效益,可以改善获得稀缺的专业技能的机会,并减少将被看守的囚犯送往医院或将精神科医生送往监狱的情况。结论:文献中没有任何内容表明法医远程精神病学服务在南非是不可行的,目前正在计划一个试点项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forensic telepsychiatry: a possible solution for South Africa?

Objective: South Africa has a shortage of facilities and psychiatrists to assess adjudicative competence of prisoners awaiting assessment under sections 77 to 79 of the Criminal Procedures Act of 1977. Various solutions have been proposed by the Department of Health. The recent linking of a Magistrate's court and a prison by videoconferencing offers the opportunity to implement a forensic telepsychiatry service. The literature on forensic telepsychiatry for assessment of adjudicative competence was reviewed.

Method: The electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl and Google Scholar were searched for papers on forensic telepsychiatry. The inclusion criterion was papers reporting the use of videoconferencing for assessment of adjudicative competence or for assessment for referral out of the judicial system, by psychiatrists or psychologists.

Results: 411 papers were found of which 13, published between 1997 and 2008 were relevant. The use of videoconferencing for forensic psychiatric assessment was reported from four countries. The courts in those jurisdictions have accepted the use of videoconferencing for assessment and no successful appeals have been mounted on the basis of the use of videoconferencing for assessment. User satisfaction has not been reported for assessing adjudicative competence. Forensic telepsychiatry has been found to be cost effective, improve access to scarce specialist skills and reduce transport of prisoners under guard to hospitals or psychiatrists to prisons.

Conclusion: There is nothing in the literature to suggest that a forensic telepsychiatry service is not feasible in South Africa and a pilot project is being planned.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信