Alexander Berghaus, Thomas Braun, John Martin Hempel
{"title":"耳廓修补术:如何处理灾难性后果。","authors":"Alexander Berghaus, Thomas Braun, John Martin Hempel","doi":"10.1001/archfacial.2012.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe how severe ear deformities after otoplasty can be corrected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The correction of creases is possible through readaptation of the cartilage edges followed by revision otoplasty using suture techniques in the reconstructed cartilage. In the case of defect formation or extreme thinning of the cartilage, an appealing auricular shape is achieved by the use of porous polyethylene implants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have treated 12 severe ear deformities in the past 2 years with the procedures described herein. In 11 cases, there were no complications, nor was it necessary to make further corrections for cosmetic reasons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reconstructing the cartilaginous skeleton and redoing otoplasty is a recommendable procedure with a longer lasting effect than just covering creases with fascia or preserved materials. In the case of a missing ear cartilage skeleton, the use of porous polyethylene implants instead of autogenous cartilage should be considered for reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":55470,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":"14 3","pages":"205-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archfacial.2012.61","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revision otoplasty: how to manage the disastrous result.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Berghaus, Thomas Braun, John Martin Hempel\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archfacial.2012.61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe how severe ear deformities after otoplasty can be corrected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The correction of creases is possible through readaptation of the cartilage edges followed by revision otoplasty using suture techniques in the reconstructed cartilage. In the case of defect formation or extreme thinning of the cartilage, an appealing auricular shape is achieved by the use of porous polyethylene implants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have treated 12 severe ear deformities in the past 2 years with the procedures described herein. In 11 cases, there were no complications, nor was it necessary to make further corrections for cosmetic reasons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reconstructing the cartilaginous skeleton and redoing otoplasty is a recommendable procedure with a longer lasting effect than just covering creases with fascia or preserved materials. In the case of a missing ear cartilage skeleton, the use of porous polyethylene implants instead of autogenous cartilage should be considered for reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"205-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archfacial.2012.61\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2012.61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2012.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Revision otoplasty: how to manage the disastrous result.
Objective: To describe how severe ear deformities after otoplasty can be corrected.
Methods: The correction of creases is possible through readaptation of the cartilage edges followed by revision otoplasty using suture techniques in the reconstructed cartilage. In the case of defect formation or extreme thinning of the cartilage, an appealing auricular shape is achieved by the use of porous polyethylene implants.
Results: We have treated 12 severe ear deformities in the past 2 years with the procedures described herein. In 11 cases, there were no complications, nor was it necessary to make further corrections for cosmetic reasons.
Conclusions: Reconstructing the cartilaginous skeleton and redoing otoplasty is a recommendable procedure with a longer lasting effect than just covering creases with fascia or preserved materials. In the case of a missing ear cartilage skeleton, the use of porous polyethylene implants instead of autogenous cartilage should be considered for reconstruction.