酷刑筛查:酷刑治疗诊所法律定义比较的叙述清单。

IF 2.5 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andrew Rasmussen, Mia Crager, Eva Keatley, Allen S Keller, Barry Rosenfeld
{"title":"酷刑筛查:酷刑治疗诊所法律定义比较的叙述清单。","authors":"Andrew Rasmussen,&nbsp;Mia Crager,&nbsp;Eva Keatley,&nbsp;Allen S Keller,&nbsp;Barry Rosenfeld","doi":"10.1027/2151-2604/a000061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Torture has been defined most precisely in legal contexts. Practitioners who work with torture survivors and researchers who study torture have frequently cited legal definitions, particularly those in the United States' Torture Victims Relief Act, the United Nations Convention against Torture, or the World Medical Association's Declaration of Tokyo. Few practitioners have operationalized these definitions and applied them in their practice. We describe how a New York City torture treatment clinic used a coding checklist that operationalizes the definitions, and present results. We found that in practice these definitions were nested; that using guidelines for applying the definitions in practice altered the number of cases meeting criteria for these definitions; and that the severity of psychological symptoms did not differ between those who were tortured and those who were not under any definition. We propose theoretical and practical implications of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47289,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","volume":"219 3","pages":"143-149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379877/pdf/nihms-381806.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for Torture: A Narrative Checklist Comparing Legal Definitions in a Torture Treatment Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Rasmussen,&nbsp;Mia Crager,&nbsp;Eva Keatley,&nbsp;Allen S Keller,&nbsp;Barry Rosenfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/2151-2604/a000061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Torture has been defined most precisely in legal contexts. Practitioners who work with torture survivors and researchers who study torture have frequently cited legal definitions, particularly those in the United States' Torture Victims Relief Act, the United Nations Convention against Torture, or the World Medical Association's Declaration of Tokyo. Few practitioners have operationalized these definitions and applied them in their practice. We describe how a New York City torture treatment clinic used a coding checklist that operationalizes the definitions, and present results. We found that in practice these definitions were nested; that using guidelines for applying the definitions in practice altered the number of cases meeting criteria for these definitions; and that the severity of psychological symptoms did not differ between those who were tortured and those who were not under any definition. We propose theoretical and practical implications of these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"219 3\",\"pages\":\"143-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379877/pdf/nihms-381806.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

酷刑的定义在法律语境中最为精确。与酷刑幸存者打交道的从业人员和研究酷刑的研究人员经常引用法律定义,特别是美国的《酷刑受害者救济法》、《联合国禁止酷刑公约》或世界医学协会的《东京宣言》中的定义。很少有从业者将这些定义操作化并在实践中应用它们。我们描述了纽约市酷刑治疗诊所如何使用编码清单来操作定义,并呈现结果。我们发现,在实践中,这些定义是嵌套的;在实践中使用适用这些定义的准则改变了符合这些定义标准的案例数量;心理症状的严重程度在遭受酷刑的人和没有遭受酷刑的人之间没有区别。我们提出了这些发现的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening for Torture: A Narrative Checklist Comparing Legal Definitions in a Torture Treatment Clinic.

Torture has been defined most precisely in legal contexts. Practitioners who work with torture survivors and researchers who study torture have frequently cited legal definitions, particularly those in the United States' Torture Victims Relief Act, the United Nations Convention against Torture, or the World Medical Association's Declaration of Tokyo. Few practitioners have operationalized these definitions and applied them in their practice. We describe how a New York City torture treatment clinic used a coding checklist that operationalizes the definitions, and present results. We found that in practice these definitions were nested; that using guidelines for applying the definitions in practice altered the number of cases meeting criteria for these definitions; and that the severity of psychological symptoms did not differ between those who were tortured and those who were not under any definition. We propose theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology
Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信