我能做什么?针对临床实践中由患者报告的结果评估确定的问题提出的应对建议。

The journal of supportive oncology Pub Date : 2012-07-01 Epub Date: 2012-05-18 DOI:10.1016/j.suponc.2012.02.002
Elizabeth F Hughes, Albert W Wu, Michael A Carducci, Claire F Snyder
{"title":"我能做什么?针对临床实践中由患者报告的结果评估确定的问题提出的应对建议。","authors":"Elizabeth F Hughes,&nbsp;Albert W Wu,&nbsp;Michael A Carducci,&nbsp;Claire F Snyder","doi":"10.1016/j.suponc.2012.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is increased interest in using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in routine clinical practice to improve patient management. The effectiveness of this intervention may be facilitated by providing suggestions to clinicians on how to address issues identified by the PROs. We sought to develop recommendations for clinicians on how to respond to issues covered by common cancer PRO questionnaires, including functional problems (eg, physical, social, emotional), symptoms (eg, diarrhea, pain), and needs (eg, patient care and support, information). The recommendations would be incorporated into a Web-based system for PRO assessment and reporting in use at our large, academic cancer center. To develop the recommendations, we conducted a multiphase, multidisciplinary, consensus process. We reviewed the literature and conducted one-on-one interviews with experts from various disciplines. Experts included medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, nurses, an internist, a palliative care specialist, an outcomes researcher, a chaplain, a social worker, and patient advocates. These interviews elicited the experts' recommendations for addressing problems in common PRO domains. Finally, we held a panel meeting attended by all the experts to attain consensus on the recommendations. The final consensus suggestions recommend further assessment of the problem as a first step. Treatment suggestions range from medication adjustments to lifestyle modifications to referrals to other disciplines. Further research will test whether clinicians find these suggestions useful for patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":"10 4","pages":"143-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.02.002","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What can I do? Recommendations for responding to issues identified by patient-reported outcomes assessments used in clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth F Hughes,&nbsp;Albert W Wu,&nbsp;Michael A Carducci,&nbsp;Claire F Snyder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suponc.2012.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is increased interest in using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in routine clinical practice to improve patient management. The effectiveness of this intervention may be facilitated by providing suggestions to clinicians on how to address issues identified by the PROs. We sought to develop recommendations for clinicians on how to respond to issues covered by common cancer PRO questionnaires, including functional problems (eg, physical, social, emotional), symptoms (eg, diarrhea, pain), and needs (eg, patient care and support, information). The recommendations would be incorporated into a Web-based system for PRO assessment and reporting in use at our large, academic cancer center. To develop the recommendations, we conducted a multiphase, multidisciplinary, consensus process. We reviewed the literature and conducted one-on-one interviews with experts from various disciplines. Experts included medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, nurses, an internist, a palliative care specialist, an outcomes researcher, a chaplain, a social worker, and patient advocates. These interviews elicited the experts' recommendations for addressing problems in common PRO domains. Finally, we held a panel meeting attended by all the experts to attain consensus on the recommendations. The final consensus suggestions recommend further assessment of the problem as a first step. Treatment suggestions range from medication adjustments to lifestyle modifications to referrals to other disciplines. Further research will test whether clinicians find these suggestions useful for patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of supportive oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"143-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.02.002\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of supportive oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.02.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/5/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.02.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

在常规临床实践中使用患者报告结果(PRO)措施来改善患者管理的兴趣越来越大。通过向临床医生提供关于如何解决专家确定的问题的建议,可以促进这种干预的有效性。我们试图为临床医生就如何应对常见癌症PRO问卷所涵盖的问题提出建议,包括功能问题(如身体、社会、情感)、症状(如腹泻、疼痛)和需求(如患者护理和支持、信息)。这些建议将被纳入一个基于网络的系统,用于我们大型学术癌症中心使用的PRO评估和报告。为了制定这些建议,我们进行了一个多阶段、多学科的共识过程。我们回顾了文献,并与来自不同学科的专家进行了一对一的访谈。专家包括医学肿瘤学家、放射肿瘤学家、护士、内科医生、姑息治疗专家、结果研究人员、牧师、社会工作者和患者倡导者。这些访谈引出了专家对解决常见PRO领域问题的建议。最后,我们召开了一个由所有专家参加的小组会议,就建议达成共识。最后的一致意见建议将进一步评估问题作为第一步。治疗建议从药物调整到生活方式的改变到转诊到其他学科。进一步的研究将测试临床医生是否发现这些建议对患者管理有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What can I do? Recommendations for responding to issues identified by patient-reported outcomes assessments used in clinical practice.

There is increased interest in using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in routine clinical practice to improve patient management. The effectiveness of this intervention may be facilitated by providing suggestions to clinicians on how to address issues identified by the PROs. We sought to develop recommendations for clinicians on how to respond to issues covered by common cancer PRO questionnaires, including functional problems (eg, physical, social, emotional), symptoms (eg, diarrhea, pain), and needs (eg, patient care and support, information). The recommendations would be incorporated into a Web-based system for PRO assessment and reporting in use at our large, academic cancer center. To develop the recommendations, we conducted a multiphase, multidisciplinary, consensus process. We reviewed the literature and conducted one-on-one interviews with experts from various disciplines. Experts included medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, nurses, an internist, a palliative care specialist, an outcomes researcher, a chaplain, a social worker, and patient advocates. These interviews elicited the experts' recommendations for addressing problems in common PRO domains. Finally, we held a panel meeting attended by all the experts to attain consensus on the recommendations. The final consensus suggestions recommend further assessment of the problem as a first step. Treatment suggestions range from medication adjustments to lifestyle modifications to referrals to other disciplines. Further research will test whether clinicians find these suggestions useful for patient management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信