空气磨损、燃烧和研磨技术对再粘合正畸托槽剪切强度的评价和比较:一项体外研究。

Hemant Kumar Halwai, Ranjit Haridas Kamble, Pushpa Vinay Hazarey, Vanita Gautam
{"title":"空气磨损、燃烧和研磨技术对再粘合正畸托槽剪切强度的评价和比较:一项体外研究。","authors":"Hemant Kumar Halwai,&nbsp;Ranjit Haridas Kamble,&nbsp;Pushpa Vinay Hazarey,&nbsp;Vanita Gautam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate and compare in vitro the shear bond strength of rebonded orthodontic brackets among the three most frequently used rebonding methods--sandblasting, direct flaming, and grinding with a green stone bur. The surface characteristics of new and rebonded bracket bases were also compared using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample used in the present study comprised 60 extracted human premolars bonded with brackets. The sample was divided into three groups (each n = 20; sandblasting, direct flaming, and grinding with a green stone bur). SEM was used to compare the surface characteristics of the new and rebonded bracket bases for all three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Z test for the direct flaming and grinding groups revealed statistically significant bond strength (P < .05). The ANOVA test for all three groups showed P < .05, which is statistically significant. SEM for the sandblasting method showed well-defined retentive areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When rebonding brackets, sandblasting the bracket base yields the highest bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":89450,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement","volume":"13 1","pages":"e1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and comparision of the shear bond strength of rebonded orthodontic brackets with air abrasion, flaming, and grinding techniques: an in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Hemant Kumar Halwai,&nbsp;Ranjit Haridas Kamble,&nbsp;Pushpa Vinay Hazarey,&nbsp;Vanita Gautam\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate and compare in vitro the shear bond strength of rebonded orthodontic brackets among the three most frequently used rebonding methods--sandblasting, direct flaming, and grinding with a green stone bur. The surface characteristics of new and rebonded bracket bases were also compared using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample used in the present study comprised 60 extracted human premolars bonded with brackets. The sample was divided into three groups (each n = 20; sandblasting, direct flaming, and grinding with a green stone bur). SEM was used to compare the surface characteristics of the new and rebonded bracket bases for all three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Z test for the direct flaming and grinding groups revealed statistically significant bond strength (P < .05). The ANOVA test for all three groups showed P < .05, which is statistically significant. SEM for the sandblasting method showed well-defined retentive areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When rebonding brackets, sandblasting the bracket base yields the highest bond strength.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价和比较三种常用的再粘接方法——喷砂、直接燃烧和绿石刀研磨对再粘接正畸托槽抗剪强度的影响。用扫描电镜(SEM)比较了新支架和再粘合支架的表面特征。方法:以60颗拔除的人前磨牙与托槽结合为研究对象。将样本分为三组(每组n = 20;喷砂,直接燃烧,用绿色石棒研磨)。用扫描电镜比较了三组新支架和再粘合支架的表面特征。结果:直接燃烧组和研磨组的Z检验显示,结合强度有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。三组的方差分析均显示P < 0.05,差异有统计学意义。喷砂方法的扫描电镜显示出明确的保留区域。结论:在重新粘接托架时,喷砂托架基部的粘接强度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and comparision of the shear bond strength of rebonded orthodontic brackets with air abrasion, flaming, and grinding techniques: an in vitro study.

Aim: To evaluate and compare in vitro the shear bond strength of rebonded orthodontic brackets among the three most frequently used rebonding methods--sandblasting, direct flaming, and grinding with a green stone bur. The surface characteristics of new and rebonded bracket bases were also compared using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Methods: The sample used in the present study comprised 60 extracted human premolars bonded with brackets. The sample was divided into three groups (each n = 20; sandblasting, direct flaming, and grinding with a green stone bur). SEM was used to compare the surface characteristics of the new and rebonded bracket bases for all three groups.

Results: The Z test for the direct flaming and grinding groups revealed statistically significant bond strength (P < .05). The ANOVA test for all three groups showed P < .05, which is statistically significant. SEM for the sandblasting method showed well-defined retentive areas.

Conclusion: When rebonding brackets, sandblasting the bracket base yields the highest bond strength.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信