体外冲击波碎石术中局部EMLA用于疼痛控制:前瞻性、比较、随机、双盲研究。

Urological Research Pub Date : 2012-10-01 Epub Date: 2012-05-04 DOI:10.1007/s00240-012-0468-0
D Gallego Vilar, G García Fadrique, C Di Capua Sacoto, J Beltran Persiva, M Perez Mestre, J A De Francia, I Povo Martin, J Miralles Aguado, C Garau Perelló, L Sanchis Verdu, J Gallego Gomez
{"title":"体外冲击波碎石术中局部EMLA用于疼痛控制:前瞻性、比较、随机、双盲研究。","authors":"D Gallego Vilar,&nbsp;G García Fadrique,&nbsp;C Di Capua Sacoto,&nbsp;J Beltran Persiva,&nbsp;M Perez Mestre,&nbsp;J A De Francia,&nbsp;I Povo Martin,&nbsp;J Miralles Aguado,&nbsp;C Garau Perelló,&nbsp;L Sanchis Verdu,&nbsp;J Gallego Gomez","doi":"10.1007/s00240-012-0468-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient collaboration in external shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is critical for its correct application, making proper analgesic selection indispensable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined application of EMLA and intravenous (i.v.) pethidine compared with pethidine plus placebo cream in patients undergoing ESWL for ureteral and/or renal lithiasis. Prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in patients receiving ESWL for renal and/or ureterolithiasis. The patients were randomly assigned to receive i.v. pethidine plus either EMLA cream (group A) or placebo hydrating cream (group B). Evaluated were type, location, and size of lithiasis, patient's sex, age, body mass index, comorbidity, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of pain, and degree of lithiasis fragmentation. EMLA cream provided significantly better pain relief and lithiasis fragmentation and more completed ESWL treatment. Topical application of EMLA cream combined with i.v. pethidine improved VAS scores and lithiasis fragmentation and decreased the rate of withdrawal from ESWL procedure versus i.v. pethidine plus placebo therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23412,"journal":{"name":"Urological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00240-012-0468-0","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical EMLA for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective, comparative, randomized, double-blind study.\",\"authors\":\"D Gallego Vilar,&nbsp;G García Fadrique,&nbsp;C Di Capua Sacoto,&nbsp;J Beltran Persiva,&nbsp;M Perez Mestre,&nbsp;J A De Francia,&nbsp;I Povo Martin,&nbsp;J Miralles Aguado,&nbsp;C Garau Perelló,&nbsp;L Sanchis Verdu,&nbsp;J Gallego Gomez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00240-012-0468-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient collaboration in external shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is critical for its correct application, making proper analgesic selection indispensable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined application of EMLA and intravenous (i.v.) pethidine compared with pethidine plus placebo cream in patients undergoing ESWL for ureteral and/or renal lithiasis. Prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in patients receiving ESWL for renal and/or ureterolithiasis. The patients were randomly assigned to receive i.v. pethidine plus either EMLA cream (group A) or placebo hydrating cream (group B). Evaluated were type, location, and size of lithiasis, patient's sex, age, body mass index, comorbidity, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of pain, and degree of lithiasis fragmentation. EMLA cream provided significantly better pain relief and lithiasis fragmentation and more completed ESWL treatment. Topical application of EMLA cream combined with i.v. pethidine improved VAS scores and lithiasis fragmentation and decreased the rate of withdrawal from ESWL procedure versus i.v. pethidine plus placebo therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urological Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00240-012-0468-0\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0468-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/5/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0468-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)中患者的配合是其正确应用的关键,正确的镇痛药物选择是必不可少的。本研究的目的是评价EMLA联合静脉注射(i.v)哌替啶与哌替啶加安慰剂乳膏在输尿管和/或肾结石ESWL患者中的疗效。前瞻性、对照、随机、双盲研究在接受ESWL治疗肾和/或输尿管结石患者中进行。患者被随机分配接受静脉注射哌替啶加EMLA乳膏(A组)或安慰剂水合乳膏(B组)。评估结石的类型、位置和大小、患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、合并症、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分和结石碎裂程度。EMLA乳膏提供了明显更好的疼痛缓解和结石碎片化,更完整的ESWL治疗。与静脉滴注哌啶加安慰剂治疗相比,局部应用EMLA乳膏联合静脉滴注哌啶改善了VAS评分和结石碎片化,降低了ESWL手术的退出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topical EMLA for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective, comparative, randomized, double-blind study.

Patient collaboration in external shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is critical for its correct application, making proper analgesic selection indispensable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined application of EMLA and intravenous (i.v.) pethidine compared with pethidine plus placebo cream in patients undergoing ESWL for ureteral and/or renal lithiasis. Prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in patients receiving ESWL for renal and/or ureterolithiasis. The patients were randomly assigned to receive i.v. pethidine plus either EMLA cream (group A) or placebo hydrating cream (group B). Evaluated were type, location, and size of lithiasis, patient's sex, age, body mass index, comorbidity, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of pain, and degree of lithiasis fragmentation. EMLA cream provided significantly better pain relief and lithiasis fragmentation and more completed ESWL treatment. Topical application of EMLA cream combined with i.v. pethidine improved VAS scores and lithiasis fragmentation and decreased the rate of withdrawal from ESWL procedure versus i.v. pethidine plus placebo therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urological Research
Urological Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信