构建新助产:20世纪80年代和90年代安大略省和魁北克省的媒体叙事。

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Stephanie Paterson, Cherry Marshall
{"title":"构建新助产:20世纪80年代和90年代安大略省和魁北克省的媒体叙事。","authors":"Stephanie Paterson,&nbsp;Cherry Marshall","doi":"10.3138/jcs.45.3.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After long periods of activism and policy debate, Ontario and Quebec were the first two provinces to integrate midwifery into their health-care services. Despite its success and growing popularity in the post-legislative era, midwifery was a highly contentious policy issue, with debates emerging at every level of policy development. In this essay, the authors explore how these debates played out in media. Specifically, the authors suggest that the frames produced by newspapers during this period served to align midwifery with broader provincial socio-political discourses, which in turn legitimized state intervention in the area of reproductive health. At the same time, however, the authors demonstrate that where Ontario media representations muted differences between midwives and physicians, representations in Quebec emphasized them. Thus, the authors show that in very different ways, media representations of midwifery in Ontario and Quebec both established a discursive context in which the state had to \"act on\" midwifery and midwives, and also challenged the potential of midwifery to transform women's birth experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":45057,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framing the new midwifery: media narratives in Ontario and Quebec during the 1980s and 1990s.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Paterson,&nbsp;Cherry Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/jcs.45.3.82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After long periods of activism and policy debate, Ontario and Quebec were the first two provinces to integrate midwifery into their health-care services. Despite its success and growing popularity in the post-legislative era, midwifery was a highly contentious policy issue, with debates emerging at every level of policy development. In this essay, the authors explore how these debates played out in media. Specifically, the authors suggest that the frames produced by newspapers during this period served to align midwifery with broader provincial socio-political discourses, which in turn legitimized state intervention in the area of reproductive health. At the same time, however, the authors demonstrate that where Ontario media representations muted differences between midwives and physicians, representations in Quebec emphasized them. Thus, the authors show that in very different ways, media representations of midwifery in Ontario and Quebec both established a discursive context in which the state had to \\\"act on\\\" midwifery and midwives, and also challenged the potential of midwifery to transform women's birth experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs.45.3.82\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs.45.3.82","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

经过长期的行动主义和政策辩论,安大略省和魁北克省是最早将助产纳入其保健服务的两个省。尽管助产在立法后的时代取得了成功并越来越受欢迎,但它是一个极具争议的政策问题,在政策制定的各个层面都出现了辩论。在这篇文章中,作者探讨了这些争论是如何在媒体中发挥作用的。具体而言,提交人认为,在这一时期,报纸制作的框架有助于将助产与更广泛的省级社会政治话语结合起来,从而使国家在生殖健康领域的干预合法化。然而,与此同时,作者证明,安大略省媒体的报道淡化了助产士和医生之间的差异,而魁北克省的报道则强调了这一点。因此,作者表明,在安大略省和魁北克省,媒体对助产的描述以非常不同的方式建立了一种话语环境,在这种环境中,国家必须“对”助产和助产士采取行动,同时也挑战了助产改变妇女分娩经历的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Framing the new midwifery: media narratives in Ontario and Quebec during the 1980s and 1990s.

After long periods of activism and policy debate, Ontario and Quebec were the first two provinces to integrate midwifery into their health-care services. Despite its success and growing popularity in the post-legislative era, midwifery was a highly contentious policy issue, with debates emerging at every level of policy development. In this essay, the authors explore how these debates played out in media. Specifically, the authors suggest that the frames produced by newspapers during this period served to align midwifery with broader provincial socio-political discourses, which in turn legitimized state intervention in the area of reproductive health. At the same time, however, the authors demonstrate that where Ontario media representations muted differences between midwives and physicians, representations in Quebec emphasized them. Thus, the authors show that in very different ways, media representations of midwifery in Ontario and Quebec both established a discursive context in which the state had to "act on" midwifery and midwives, and also challenged the potential of midwifery to transform women's birth experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信