LR102装置咳嗽频率的客观评价:准确性。

Sophie Leconte, Giuseppe Liistro, Patrick Lebecque, Jean-Marie Degryse
{"title":"LR102装置咳嗽频率的客观评价:准确性。","authors":"Sophie Leconte,&nbsp;Giuseppe Liistro,&nbsp;Patrick Lebecque,&nbsp;Jean-Marie Degryse","doi":"10.1186/1745-9974-7-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The measurement of cough frequency is problematic and most often based on subjective assessment. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of the automatic identification of cough episodes by LR102, a cough frequency meter based on electromyography and audio sensors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten adult patients complaining of cough were recruited in primary care and hospital settings. Participants were asked to wear LR102 for 4 consecutive hours during which they were also filmed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measures of cough frequency by LR102 and manual counting were closely correlated (r = 0.87 for number of cough episodes per hour; r = 0.89 for number of single coughs per hour) but LR102 overestimated cough frequency. Bland-Altman plots indicate that differences between the two measurements were not influenced by cough frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LR102 offers a useful estimate of cough frequency in adults in their own environment, while significantly reducing the time required for analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10747,"journal":{"name":"Cough (London, England)","volume":"7 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-7-11","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The objective assessment of cough frequency: accuracy of the LR102 device.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Leconte,&nbsp;Giuseppe Liistro,&nbsp;Patrick Lebecque,&nbsp;Jean-Marie Degryse\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1745-9974-7-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The measurement of cough frequency is problematic and most often based on subjective assessment. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of the automatic identification of cough episodes by LR102, a cough frequency meter based on electromyography and audio sensors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten adult patients complaining of cough were recruited in primary care and hospital settings. Participants were asked to wear LR102 for 4 consecutive hours during which they were also filmed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measures of cough frequency by LR102 and manual counting were closely correlated (r = 0.87 for number of cough episodes per hour; r = 0.89 for number of single coughs per hour) but LR102 overestimated cough frequency. Bland-Altman plots indicate that differences between the two measurements were not influenced by cough frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LR102 offers a useful estimate of cough frequency in adults in their own environment, while significantly reducing the time required for analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cough (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-7-11\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cough (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-7-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cough (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-7-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

背景:咳嗽频率的测量是有问题的,大多数是基于主观评估。本研究的目的是评估LR102(一种基于肌电图和音频传感器的咳嗽频率计)自动识别咳嗽发作的准确性。方法:在初级保健和医院招募10例有咳嗽症状的成年患者。参与者被要求连续4个小时穿着LR102,在此期间他们也被拍摄。结果:LR102测量咳嗽频次与人工计数密切相关(r = 0.87);每小时咳嗽次数r = 0.89),但LR102高估了咳嗽频率。Bland-Altman图表明两种测量值之间的差异不受咳嗽频率的影响。结论:LR102提供了一个有用的估计成人咳嗽频率在他们自己的环境中,同时显著减少所需的分析时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The objective assessment of cough frequency: accuracy of the LR102 device.

The objective assessment of cough frequency: accuracy of the LR102 device.

The objective assessment of cough frequency: accuracy of the LR102 device.

The objective assessment of cough frequency: accuracy of the LR102 device.

Background: The measurement of cough frequency is problematic and most often based on subjective assessment. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of the automatic identification of cough episodes by LR102, a cough frequency meter based on electromyography and audio sensors.

Methods: Ten adult patients complaining of cough were recruited in primary care and hospital settings. Participants were asked to wear LR102 for 4 consecutive hours during which they were also filmed.

Results: Measures of cough frequency by LR102 and manual counting were closely correlated (r = 0.87 for number of cough episodes per hour; r = 0.89 for number of single coughs per hour) but LR102 overestimated cough frequency. Bland-Altman plots indicate that differences between the two measurements were not influenced by cough frequency.

Conclusions: LR102 offers a useful estimate of cough frequency in adults in their own environment, while significantly reducing the time required for analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信