[子宫切除术的手术方法]。

Serge Pither, L S Bayonne Manou, J M Mandji Lawson, T D D Tchantchou, R Tchoua, J P Ponties
{"title":"[子宫切除术的手术方法]。","authors":"Serge Pither,&nbsp;L S Bayonne Manou,&nbsp;J M Mandji Lawson,&nbsp;T D D Tchantchou,&nbsp;R Tchoua,&nbsp;J P Ponties","doi":"10.1684/san.2011.0249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>this study aims to assess the frequency, complications and advantages of each of the three principal approaches to hysterectomies: abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic.</p><p><strong>Patients and method: </strong>this prospective study analyses a consecutive series of 78 hysterectomies for benign disease (myomas and precancerous lesions of the cervix) in the gynaecological surgery department of Libreville Hospital Centre from March 1, 2006, to November, 2010. We excluded cases of genital prolapsus, invasive uterine cancer, and hysterectomy during pregnancy or delivery. Data were collected from the surgical registers and reports and from patients' files.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the frequency of abdominal hysterectomy was about 39% (31 cases), and that of vaginal hysterectomy 61% (31 cases); laparoscopic assistance was involved in 20.58% (14 cases). The women's mean age was 46  years (range: 45 to 60  years). Mean parity was 5.5 (range: 0 to 9). Overall, 30% of the patients had previously undergone pelvic surgery by the abdominal route. Two wounds, one of the bladder and the other of the uterus, comprised the surgical morbidity. No deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the surgeon's experience with the vaginal route, sometimes with laparoscopic assistance, resulted in limited use of the abdominal route.</p>","PeriodicalId":79375,"journal":{"name":"Sante (Montrouge, France)","volume":"21 2","pages":"79-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1684/san.2011.0249","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Surgical approaches to hysterectomy].\",\"authors\":\"Serge Pither,&nbsp;L S Bayonne Manou,&nbsp;J M Mandji Lawson,&nbsp;T D D Tchantchou,&nbsp;R Tchoua,&nbsp;J P Ponties\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/san.2011.0249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>this study aims to assess the frequency, complications and advantages of each of the three principal approaches to hysterectomies: abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic.</p><p><strong>Patients and method: </strong>this prospective study analyses a consecutive series of 78 hysterectomies for benign disease (myomas and precancerous lesions of the cervix) in the gynaecological surgery department of Libreville Hospital Centre from March 1, 2006, to November, 2010. We excluded cases of genital prolapsus, invasive uterine cancer, and hysterectomy during pregnancy or delivery. Data were collected from the surgical registers and reports and from patients' files.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the frequency of abdominal hysterectomy was about 39% (31 cases), and that of vaginal hysterectomy 61% (31 cases); laparoscopic assistance was involved in 20.58% (14 cases). The women's mean age was 46  years (range: 45 to 60  years). Mean parity was 5.5 (range: 0 to 9). Overall, 30% of the patients had previously undergone pelvic surgery by the abdominal route. Two wounds, one of the bladder and the other of the uterus, comprised the surgical morbidity. No deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the surgeon's experience with the vaginal route, sometimes with laparoscopic assistance, resulted in limited use of the abdominal route.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sante (Montrouge, France)\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"79-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1684/san.2011.0249\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sante (Montrouge, France)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/san.2011.0249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante (Montrouge, France)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/san.2011.0249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估三种主要子宫切除术方法的频率、并发症和优点:腹部、阴道和腹腔镜。患者和方法:本前瞻性研究分析了利伯维尔医院中心妇科外科从2006年3月1日至2010年11月期间因良性疾病(子宫肌瘤和子宫颈癌前病变)而进行的连续78例子宫切除术。我们排除了妊娠或分娩期间生殖器脱垂、侵袭性子宫癌和子宫切除术的病例。数据收集自手术登记簿和报告以及患者档案。结果:经腹子宫切除术31例(39%),经阴道子宫切除术31例(61%);腹腔镜辅助14例,占20.58%。这些妇女的平均年龄为46岁(范围:45至60岁)。平均胎次为5.5(范围:0 - 9)。总体而言,30%的患者曾通过腹部途径进行盆腔手术。两处伤口,一处在膀胱,另一处在子宫,构成了手术并发症。没有人员死亡。结论:外科医生对阴道路径的经验,有时在腹腔镜辅助下,导致限制使用腹部路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Surgical approaches to hysterectomy].

Objectives: this study aims to assess the frequency, complications and advantages of each of the three principal approaches to hysterectomies: abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic.

Patients and method: this prospective study analyses a consecutive series of 78 hysterectomies for benign disease (myomas and precancerous lesions of the cervix) in the gynaecological surgery department of Libreville Hospital Centre from March 1, 2006, to November, 2010. We excluded cases of genital prolapsus, invasive uterine cancer, and hysterectomy during pregnancy or delivery. Data were collected from the surgical registers and reports and from patients' files.

Results: the frequency of abdominal hysterectomy was about 39% (31 cases), and that of vaginal hysterectomy 61% (31 cases); laparoscopic assistance was involved in 20.58% (14 cases). The women's mean age was 46  years (range: 45 to 60  years). Mean parity was 5.5 (range: 0 to 9). Overall, 30% of the patients had previously undergone pelvic surgery by the abdominal route. Two wounds, one of the bladder and the other of the uterus, comprised the surgical morbidity. No deaths occurred.

Conclusion: the surgeon's experience with the vaginal route, sometimes with laparoscopic assistance, resulted in limited use of the abdominal route.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信