心肺复苏期间的家庭存在:心脏保健专业人员的观点。

Sarah Kosowan, Louise Jensen
{"title":"心肺复苏期间的家庭存在:心脏保健专业人员的观点。","authors":"Sarah Kosowan,&nbsp;Louise Jensen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family presence (FP) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is becoming an increasing practice. Within current literature, the attitudes and beliefs towards FP of cardiac health care professionals in Canada are limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this project was to examine the perceptions of cardiac health care professionals (n=368) concerning FP during CPR.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey was conducted to explore the attitudes and beliefs of cardiac health care professionals towards family presence during CPR within five Edmonton and surrounding area hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 46%, with the greatest response from nurses and physicians. Of the respondents, 44.3% believed that family should have the option to be present, and 40.9% believed that family should be allowed at the bedside during CPR. Less than half of the respondents had experience with FP during CPR. The barriers identified towards FP were lack of support for families, the experience would be too traumatic for families, families would not understand the procedures, fear of families physically interfering with procedures, FP would increase stress levels among staff, and tradition and politics excludes FP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite less than half the respondents supporting FP the majority endorsed development of policy and procedures to overcome barriers to FP during CPR.</p>","PeriodicalId":77057,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires","volume":"21 3","pages":"23-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: cardiac health care professionals' perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Kosowan,&nbsp;Louise Jensen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family presence (FP) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is becoming an increasing practice. Within current literature, the attitudes and beliefs towards FP of cardiac health care professionals in Canada are limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this project was to examine the perceptions of cardiac health care professionals (n=368) concerning FP during CPR.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey was conducted to explore the attitudes and beliefs of cardiac health care professionals towards family presence during CPR within five Edmonton and surrounding area hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 46%, with the greatest response from nurses and physicians. Of the respondents, 44.3% believed that family should have the option to be present, and 40.9% believed that family should be allowed at the bedside during CPR. Less than half of the respondents had experience with FP during CPR. The barriers identified towards FP were lack of support for families, the experience would be too traumatic for families, families would not understand the procedures, fear of families physically interfering with procedures, FP would increase stress levels among staff, and tradition and politics excludes FP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite less than half the respondents supporting FP the majority endorsed development of policy and procedures to overcome barriers to FP during CPR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"23-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:家庭在场(FP)在心肺复苏(CPR)中的应用越来越普遍。在目前的文献中,加拿大心脏保健专业人员对FP的态度和信念是有限的。目的:本研究的目的是研究心脏保健专业人员(n=368)在心肺复苏术中对FP的看法。方法:调查埃德蒙顿及周边地区五家医院的心脏保健专业人员对心肺复苏术中家属在场的态度和信念。结果:问卷调查的回复率为46%,其中护士和内科医生的回复率最高。在受访者中,44.3%的人认为家属应该有选择在场的权利,40.9%的人认为应该允许家属在心肺复苏术期间在床边。不到一半的应答者在心肺复苏术中有FP的经验。实施计划生育的障碍包括:缺乏对家庭的支持,这种经历对家庭来说太痛苦,家庭不理解程序,害怕家庭干预程序,计划生育会增加工作人员的压力水平,传统和政治排斥计划生育。结论:尽管不到一半的受访者支持计划生育,但大多数人支持制定政策和程序,以克服心肺复苏术期间计划生育的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: cardiac health care professionals' perspectives.

Background: Family presence (FP) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is becoming an increasing practice. Within current literature, the attitudes and beliefs towards FP of cardiac health care professionals in Canada are limited.

Purpose: The purpose of this project was to examine the perceptions of cardiac health care professionals (n=368) concerning FP during CPR.

Method: A survey was conducted to explore the attitudes and beliefs of cardiac health care professionals towards family presence during CPR within five Edmonton and surrounding area hospitals.

Results: The response rate was 46%, with the greatest response from nurses and physicians. Of the respondents, 44.3% believed that family should have the option to be present, and 40.9% believed that family should be allowed at the bedside during CPR. Less than half of the respondents had experience with FP during CPR. The barriers identified towards FP were lack of support for families, the experience would be too traumatic for families, families would not understand the procedures, fear of families physically interfering with procedures, FP would increase stress levels among staff, and tradition and politics excludes FP.

Conclusion: Despite less than half the respondents supporting FP the majority endorsed development of policy and procedures to overcome barriers to FP during CPR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信