长期留置导尿管患者的导尿管寿命和导尿管干预的前瞻性登记。

Karin Jonsson, Anna-Lena E-Son Loft, Salmir Nasic, Hans Hedelin
{"title":"长期留置导尿管患者的导尿管寿命和导尿管干预的前瞻性登记。","authors":"Karin Jonsson,&nbsp;Anna-Lena E-Son Loft,&nbsp;Salmir Nasic,&nbsp;Hans Hedelin","doi":"10.3109/00365599.2011.590998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to register the incidence of scheduled and acute urinary catheter changes and rinses (acute interventions) among nursing home patients, to relate the incidence of acute interventions to catheter material and time of catheterization, and to register the use of antibiotics for catheter-associated urinary tract infections.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Catheter life and catheter-related interventions were followed prospectively for 1 year in all patients with long-term indwelling catheters in all 78 nursing homes in a county in western Sweden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 366 patients were followed: 117 (32%) women and 249 (68%) men. Acute changes (n = 718) were more common than scheduled ones (n = 519). The rate of acute interventions was not related to catheter material and was significantly lower in patients with a catheter for over 2 years. In 25% of the patients, acute interventions were virtually never necessary, in contrast to 10% where acute interventions were registered nearly every month. Antibiotic treatment for reasons assumed to be related to the urinary tract was instituted on 170 occasions among 85 men (34%) and 20 women (17%), a significant difference between the genders (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS; No catheter material appeared to be superior. The surprising finding that acute interventions were less common after 2 years' catheterization needs further study to be verified and explained. Only 10-25% had a more frequent need for acute interventions and are candidates for future interventional studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21543,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","volume":"45 6","pages":"401-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365599.2011.590998","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective registration of catheter life and catheter interventions in patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters.\",\"authors\":\"Karin Jonsson,&nbsp;Anna-Lena E-Son Loft,&nbsp;Salmir Nasic,&nbsp;Hans Hedelin\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/00365599.2011.590998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to register the incidence of scheduled and acute urinary catheter changes and rinses (acute interventions) among nursing home patients, to relate the incidence of acute interventions to catheter material and time of catheterization, and to register the use of antibiotics for catheter-associated urinary tract infections.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Catheter life and catheter-related interventions were followed prospectively for 1 year in all patients with long-term indwelling catheters in all 78 nursing homes in a county in western Sweden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 366 patients were followed: 117 (32%) women and 249 (68%) men. Acute changes (n = 718) were more common than scheduled ones (n = 519). The rate of acute interventions was not related to catheter material and was significantly lower in patients with a catheter for over 2 years. In 25% of the patients, acute interventions were virtually never necessary, in contrast to 10% where acute interventions were registered nearly every month. Antibiotic treatment for reasons assumed to be related to the urinary tract was instituted on 170 occasions among 85 men (34%) and 20 women (17%), a significant difference between the genders (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS; No catheter material appeared to be superior. The surprising finding that acute interventions were less common after 2 years' catheterization needs further study to be verified and explained. Only 10-25% had a more frequent need for acute interventions and are candidates for future interventional studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"401-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365599.2011.590998\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2011.590998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2011.590998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是记录养老院患者定期和急性尿管更换和冲洗(急性干预)的发生率,将急性干预发生率与导尿管材料和置管时间联系起来,并记录导尿管相关尿路感染的抗生素使用情况。材料和方法:在瑞典西部一个县的78家养老院,对所有长期留置导尿管的患者进行为期1年的前瞻性随访。结果:共随访366例患者,其中女性117例(32%),男性249例(68%)。急性改变(n = 718)较常规改变(n = 519)更为常见。急性干预率与导管材料无关,并且在使用导管超过2年的患者中显著降低。在25%的患者中,几乎从来没有必要进行急性干预,而在10%的患者中,几乎每个月都登记一次急性干预。在85名男性(34%)和20名女性(17%)中,因推测与泌尿道有关的原因进行了170次抗生素治疗,性别之间存在显著差异(p < 0.01)。结论;没有任何导管材料表现出优越性。这一令人惊讶的发现,即2年后急性干预不常见,需要进一步的研究来验证和解释。只有10-25%的患者更频繁地需要急性干预,是未来介入研究的候选对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prospective registration of catheter life and catheter interventions in patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters.

Objective: The aims of this study were to register the incidence of scheduled and acute urinary catheter changes and rinses (acute interventions) among nursing home patients, to relate the incidence of acute interventions to catheter material and time of catheterization, and to register the use of antibiotics for catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

Material and methods: Catheter life and catheter-related interventions were followed prospectively for 1 year in all patients with long-term indwelling catheters in all 78 nursing homes in a county in western Sweden.

Results: Altogether, 366 patients were followed: 117 (32%) women and 249 (68%) men. Acute changes (n = 718) were more common than scheduled ones (n = 519). The rate of acute interventions was not related to catheter material and was significantly lower in patients with a catheter for over 2 years. In 25% of the patients, acute interventions were virtually never necessary, in contrast to 10% where acute interventions were registered nearly every month. Antibiotic treatment for reasons assumed to be related to the urinary tract was instituted on 170 occasions among 85 men (34%) and 20 women (17%), a significant difference between the genders (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS; No catheter material appeared to be superior. The surprising finding that acute interventions were less common after 2 years' catheterization needs further study to be verified and explained. Only 10-25% had a more frequent need for acute interventions and are candidates for future interventional studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信