采用新医疗技术的争议。

Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-05-20 DOI:10.1159/000322401
Paul E Wallner, Michael L Steinberg, Andre A Konski
{"title":"采用新医疗技术的争议。","authors":"Paul E Wallner,&nbsp;Michael L Steinberg,&nbsp;Andre A Konski","doi":"10.1159/000322401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare economists generally agree that the development and rapid introduction of new technologies and the expanding utilization of existing ones in national healthcare systems have been significant factors in the dramatic and potentially unsustainable growth in healthcare spending. Creating a rational system for evaluation of emerging technologies in this country has been complicated by 3 broad issues: the often conflicting needs and expectations of the variety of stakeholders; an arcane and often illogical system of service valuation and payment; and the lack of a standardized, transparent and validated approach to the measurement of 'value.' Recent discussions on reforming the elements of healthcare delivery have increased focus on these systemic shortcomings and conflicts. As a specialty that is clinically wedded to modern and increasingly expensive technology, radiation oncology has often been singled out for scrutiny. A thorough examination and understanding of the various factors and controversies involved in technology development, implementation and valuation analysis is essential to rational growth and development of the specialty.</p>","PeriodicalId":55140,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology","volume":"43 ","pages":"60-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000322401","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversies in the adoption of new healthcare technologies.\",\"authors\":\"Paul E Wallner,&nbsp;Michael L Steinberg,&nbsp;Andre A Konski\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000322401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare economists generally agree that the development and rapid introduction of new technologies and the expanding utilization of existing ones in national healthcare systems have been significant factors in the dramatic and potentially unsustainable growth in healthcare spending. Creating a rational system for evaluation of emerging technologies in this country has been complicated by 3 broad issues: the often conflicting needs and expectations of the variety of stakeholders; an arcane and often illogical system of service valuation and payment; and the lack of a standardized, transparent and validated approach to the measurement of 'value.' Recent discussions on reforming the elements of healthcare delivery have increased focus on these systemic shortcomings and conflicts. As a specialty that is clinically wedded to modern and increasingly expensive technology, radiation oncology has often been singled out for scrutiny. A thorough examination and understanding of the various factors and controversies involved in technology development, implementation and valuation analysis is essential to rational growth and development of the specialty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"60-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000322401\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000322401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000322401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

医疗保健经济学家普遍认为,新技术的发展和快速引进,以及国家医疗保健系统中现有技术的扩大利用,是医疗保健支出急剧增长和可能不可持续增长的重要因素。在这个国家建立一个合理的新兴技术评估体系一直被三大问题复杂化:各种利益相关者经常相互冲突的需求和期望;一种晦涩难懂且常常不合逻辑的服务估价和支付体系;以及缺乏一种标准化、透明和有效的方法来衡量“价值”。最近关于改革医疗保健服务要素的讨论增加了对这些系统性缺陷和冲突的关注。作为一种与现代和日益昂贵的技术相结合的临床专业,放射肿瘤学经常被挑出来进行审查。对技术开发、实施和评估分析中涉及的各种因素和争议进行彻底的检查和理解,对该专业的合理成长和发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversies in the adoption of new healthcare technologies.

Healthcare economists generally agree that the development and rapid introduction of new technologies and the expanding utilization of existing ones in national healthcare systems have been significant factors in the dramatic and potentially unsustainable growth in healthcare spending. Creating a rational system for evaluation of emerging technologies in this country has been complicated by 3 broad issues: the often conflicting needs and expectations of the variety of stakeholders; an arcane and often illogical system of service valuation and payment; and the lack of a standardized, transparent and validated approach to the measurement of 'value.' Recent discussions on reforming the elements of healthcare delivery have increased focus on these systemic shortcomings and conflicts. As a specialty that is clinically wedded to modern and increasingly expensive technology, radiation oncology has often been singled out for scrutiny. A thorough examination and understanding of the various factors and controversies involved in technology development, implementation and valuation analysis is essential to rational growth and development of the specialty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信