使用三维色度引导系统为不同年龄组分配色彩空间。

Helene J Haddad, Ziad Salameh, Walid Sadig, Moustafa Aboushelib, Holger A Jakstat
{"title":"使用三维色度引导系统为不同年龄组分配色彩空间。","authors":"Helene J Haddad,&nbsp;Ziad Salameh,&nbsp;Walid Sadig,&nbsp;Moustafa Aboushelib,&nbsp;Holger A Jakstat","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the color space and the coverage error of two manual shade guide systems in four age groups of a selected population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 174 patients were divided into four age groups and the shade of their natural teeth was measured (2067 teeth) with a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade). Color parameters in terms of L*, a*, b* values, chroma, and hue were recorded for each tooth. Color difference (ΔE*min) between each natural tooth and the closest match using two manual shade guide systems were calculated (3D Master shade guide standard and 3D Master shade guide with intermediate values). A Wilcoxon test was used to assess statistical differences between mean ΔE*min values for each system (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recoded ΔE of the two tested manual systems was 6.19 for 3D Master shade guide (standard) and 6.02 for 3D Master shade guide (intermediate values). A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) was found between the mean ΔE*min of the two systems. 47% of natural teeth presented a best match with intermediate value and chroma shade tabs. The mean ΔE*min was influenced by the age group of the patients (5.15, 5.23, 6.58, and 6.69, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using intermediate value and chroma did not improve shade match, nor the coverage error of the tested population. Nevertheless, better coverage error was observed in younger age groups compared to older anterior teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":88322,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","volume":"6 1","pages":"94-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allocation of color space for different age groups using three-dimensional shade guide systems.\",\"authors\":\"Helene J Haddad,&nbsp;Ziad Salameh,&nbsp;Walid Sadig,&nbsp;Moustafa Aboushelib,&nbsp;Holger A Jakstat\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the color space and the coverage error of two manual shade guide systems in four age groups of a selected population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 174 patients were divided into four age groups and the shade of their natural teeth was measured (2067 teeth) with a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade). Color parameters in terms of L*, a*, b* values, chroma, and hue were recorded for each tooth. Color difference (ΔE*min) between each natural tooth and the closest match using two manual shade guide systems were calculated (3D Master shade guide standard and 3D Master shade guide with intermediate values). A Wilcoxon test was used to assess statistical differences between mean ΔE*min values for each system (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recoded ΔE of the two tested manual systems was 6.19 for 3D Master shade guide (standard) and 6.02 for 3D Master shade guide (intermediate values). A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) was found between the mean ΔE*min of the two systems. 47% of natural teeth presented a best match with intermediate value and chroma shade tabs. The mean ΔE*min was influenced by the age group of the patients (5.15, 5.23, 6.58, and 6.69, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using intermediate value and chroma did not improve shade match, nor the coverage error of the tested population. Nevertheless, better coverage error was observed in younger age groups compared to older anterior teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"94-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定两种手动阴影引导系统在选定人群的四个年龄组中的色彩空间和覆盖误差。材料与方法:将174例患者分为4个年龄组,用分光光度计(Vita Easyshade)测量其自然牙(2067颗牙)的色度。记录每颗牙齿的L*、a*、b*值、色度和色调的颜色参数。计算两种手动色度指导系统(3D Master色度指导标准和3D Master色度指导中间值)下每颗天然牙与最接近匹配的色差(ΔE*min)。采用Wilcoxon检验评估各系统平均ΔE*min值之间的统计学差异(α = 0.05)。结果:两种被测手册系统的编码ΔE分别为:3D Master shade guide(标准)6.19和3D Master shade guide(中间值)6.02。两种系统的平均ΔE*min差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。47%的天然牙与中间值和色度阴影标签匹配最好。平均ΔE*min受患者年龄的影响,分别为5.15、5.23、6.58、6.69。结论:使用中间值和色度并不能改善色度匹配,也不能改善被测人群的覆盖误差。然而,与老年前牙相比,在年轻年龄组中观察到更好的覆盖误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Allocation of color space for different age groups using three-dimensional shade guide systems.

Purpose: To determine the color space and the coverage error of two manual shade guide systems in four age groups of a selected population.

Material and methods: A total of 174 patients were divided into four age groups and the shade of their natural teeth was measured (2067 teeth) with a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade). Color parameters in terms of L*, a*, b* values, chroma, and hue were recorded for each tooth. Color difference (ΔE*min) between each natural tooth and the closest match using two manual shade guide systems were calculated (3D Master shade guide standard and 3D Master shade guide with intermediate values). A Wilcoxon test was used to assess statistical differences between mean ΔE*min values for each system (α = 0.05).

Results: The recoded ΔE of the two tested manual systems was 6.19 for 3D Master shade guide (standard) and 6.02 for 3D Master shade guide (intermediate values). A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) was found between the mean ΔE*min of the two systems. 47% of natural teeth presented a best match with intermediate value and chroma shade tabs. The mean ΔE*min was influenced by the age group of the patients (5.15, 5.23, 6.58, and 6.69, respectively).

Conclusion: Using intermediate value and chroma did not improve shade match, nor the coverage error of the tested population. Nevertheless, better coverage error was observed in younger age groups compared to older anterior teeth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信