基因治疗的伦理:平衡风险。

Claire T Deakin, Ian E Alexander, Ian Kerridge
{"title":"基因治疗的伦理:平衡风险。","authors":"Claire T Deakin,&nbsp;Ian E Alexander,&nbsp;Ian Kerridge","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gene therapy research is characterized by heightened uncertainty about the risks associated with the complex products involved, particularly the risk of genotoxicity. Recognizing that uncertainty concerning risks is inescapable in first-in-human clinical trials of gene therapy, decisions on how to balance the risks nevertheless must be made. Ethics can facilitate translational progress by, first, evaluating decision-making processes during risk assessment; and second, focusing on questions that require a degree of subjective judgement. Such assessments include determining the level of risk that is acceptable in trials, the category of patients that should be exposed to the risks, and the level of certainty with respect to risk that is required for both researchers and participants to make decisions. Analysis of these issues is affected by the burden of illness, existing treatment alternatives and the possible benefits of gene therapy. Patients' attitudes and experiences in this regard can reasonably inform the decision-making of researchers. Reflecting upon the approaches used to balance risks and possible benefits in gene therapy trials may improve decision-making processes across the spectrum of decisions that are made from the initial conception of a study up to decisions by research participants about consent. This manner of reflection facilitates the advancement of science, while protecting the welfare of research participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":50605,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics","volume":"12 5","pages":"578-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ethics of gene therapy: balancing the risks.\",\"authors\":\"Claire T Deakin,&nbsp;Ian E Alexander,&nbsp;Ian Kerridge\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gene therapy research is characterized by heightened uncertainty about the risks associated with the complex products involved, particularly the risk of genotoxicity. Recognizing that uncertainty concerning risks is inescapable in first-in-human clinical trials of gene therapy, decisions on how to balance the risks nevertheless must be made. Ethics can facilitate translational progress by, first, evaluating decision-making processes during risk assessment; and second, focusing on questions that require a degree of subjective judgement. Such assessments include determining the level of risk that is acceptable in trials, the category of patients that should be exposed to the risks, and the level of certainty with respect to risk that is required for both researchers and participants to make decisions. Analysis of these issues is affected by the burden of illness, existing treatment alternatives and the possible benefits of gene therapy. Patients' attitudes and experiences in this regard can reasonably inform the decision-making of researchers. Reflecting upon the approaches used to balance risks and possible benefits in gene therapy trials may improve decision-making processes across the spectrum of decisions that are made from the initial conception of a study up to decisions by research participants about consent. This manner of reflection facilitates the advancement of science, while protecting the welfare of research participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"578-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因治疗研究的特点是与所涉及的复杂产物相关的风险,特别是遗传毒性风险的不确定性增加。认识到风险的不确定性在基因治疗的首次人体临床试验中是不可避免的,但必须做出如何平衡风险的决定。伦理可以通过以下方式促进转化进展:首先,在风险评估期间评估决策过程;第二,关注那些需要一定程度主观判断的问题。这些评估包括确定试验中可接受的风险水平,应该暴露于风险的患者类别,以及研究人员和参与者做出决定所需的风险确定性水平。对这些问题的分析受到疾病负担、现有治疗方案和基因治疗可能带来的益处的影响。患者在这方面的态度和经验可以合理地为研究人员的决策提供信息。反思基因治疗试验中用于平衡风险和可能收益的方法,可能会改善整个决策过程,从最初的研究概念到研究参与者关于同意的决定。这种反思方式促进了科学的进步,同时保护了研究参与者的福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ethics of gene therapy: balancing the risks.

Gene therapy research is characterized by heightened uncertainty about the risks associated with the complex products involved, particularly the risk of genotoxicity. Recognizing that uncertainty concerning risks is inescapable in first-in-human clinical trials of gene therapy, decisions on how to balance the risks nevertheless must be made. Ethics can facilitate translational progress by, first, evaluating decision-making processes during risk assessment; and second, focusing on questions that require a degree of subjective judgement. Such assessments include determining the level of risk that is acceptable in trials, the category of patients that should be exposed to the risks, and the level of certainty with respect to risk that is required for both researchers and participants to make decisions. Analysis of these issues is affected by the burden of illness, existing treatment alternatives and the possible benefits of gene therapy. Patients' attitudes and experiences in this regard can reasonably inform the decision-making of researchers. Reflecting upon the approaches used to balance risks and possible benefits in gene therapy trials may improve decision-making processes across the spectrum of decisions that are made from the initial conception of a study up to decisions by research participants about consent. This manner of reflection facilitates the advancement of science, while protecting the welfare of research participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics
Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信