支持性的控制或约束:术语和实践。

Karen Jeffery
{"title":"支持性的控制或约束:术语和实践。","authors":"Karen Jeffery","doi":"10.7748/paed2010.07.22.6.24.c7841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The meaning of supportive holding versus restraint in children's nursing has been debated for some time. Supportive holding has been defined as a hold that supports the child through a therapeutic intervention, and restraint as a hold that overpowers the child who may be a danger to themselves or others. Both are conducted in the philosophy of best interest. The Royal College of Nursing (2010) guidance suggests adopting the terms therapeutic holding and restrictive physical intervention. This article was accepted before the new guidance was published. However, with authors still using terms interchangeably, it is important to debate whether there is a clear demarcation in terminology and practice, or whether one is a continuation of the other, differentiated by the degree of force used.</p>","PeriodicalId":79363,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric nursing","volume":"22 6","pages":"24-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7748/paed2010.07.22.6.24.c7841","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supportive holding or restraint: terminology and practice.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Jeffery\",\"doi\":\"10.7748/paed2010.07.22.6.24.c7841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The meaning of supportive holding versus restraint in children's nursing has been debated for some time. Supportive holding has been defined as a hold that supports the child through a therapeutic intervention, and restraint as a hold that overpowers the child who may be a danger to themselves or others. Both are conducted in the philosophy of best interest. The Royal College of Nursing (2010) guidance suggests adopting the terms therapeutic holding and restrictive physical intervention. This article was accepted before the new guidance was published. However, with authors still using terms interchangeably, it is important to debate whether there is a clear demarcation in terminology and practice, or whether one is a continuation of the other, differentiated by the degree of force used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric nursing\",\"volume\":\"22 6\",\"pages\":\"24-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7748/paed2010.07.22.6.24.c7841\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7748/paed2010.07.22.6.24.c7841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/paed2010.07.22.6.24.c7841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

支持性抱持与约束在儿童护理中的意义已经争论了一段时间。支持性抱持被定义为通过治疗性干预支持孩子的抱持,而克制性抱持被定义为压制可能对自己或他人构成危险的孩子的抱持。两者都是在最佳利益的哲学下进行的。皇家护理学院(2010)的指导建议采用治疗性保持和限制性物理干预这两个术语。这篇文章在新指南发布之前就被接受了。然而,由于作者仍然交替使用术语,争论术语和实践之间是否有明确的界限,或者是否一个是另一个的延续,根据使用的武力程度进行区分是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supportive holding or restraint: terminology and practice.

The meaning of supportive holding versus restraint in children's nursing has been debated for some time. Supportive holding has been defined as a hold that supports the child through a therapeutic intervention, and restraint as a hold that overpowers the child who may be a danger to themselves or others. Both are conducted in the philosophy of best interest. The Royal College of Nursing (2010) guidance suggests adopting the terms therapeutic holding and restrictive physical intervention. This article was accepted before the new guidance was published. However, with authors still using terms interchangeably, it is important to debate whether there is a clear demarcation in terminology and practice, or whether one is a continuation of the other, differentiated by the degree of force used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信