选择合适的飞行伙伴。

L D ZELENY
{"title":"选择合适的飞行伙伴。","authors":"L D ZELENY","doi":"10.1086/220035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though mutual confidence is essential in flying, pairs of cadet pilot-observers, flying partners in an Army Air Forces flying school, were picked alphabetically, without regard to human relations. Sociometric tests, in which each man stated his most and least preferred choices of partner, were set up; and the degrees of interrelationship among members of \"elements\" of five to seven men were mathematically expressed. On the basis of the tests, it was possible to place nearly all cadets with compatible partners. A man's status in the whole group was also computed by comparing his fellow's acceptances and rejections of him.","PeriodicalId":86247,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of sociology","volume":"52 5","pages":"424-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1947-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/220035","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of compatible flying partners.\",\"authors\":\"L D ZELENY\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/220035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though mutual confidence is essential in flying, pairs of cadet pilot-observers, flying partners in an Army Air Forces flying school, were picked alphabetically, without regard to human relations. Sociometric tests, in which each man stated his most and least preferred choices of partner, were set up; and the degrees of interrelationship among members of \\\"elements\\\" of five to seven men were mathematically expressed. On the basis of the tests, it was possible to place nearly all cadets with compatible partners. A man's status in the whole group was also computed by comparing his fellow's acceptances and rejections of him.\",\"PeriodicalId\":86247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of sociology\",\"volume\":\"52 5\",\"pages\":\"424-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1947-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/220035\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/220035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/220035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection of compatible flying partners.
Though mutual confidence is essential in flying, pairs of cadet pilot-observers, flying partners in an Army Air Forces flying school, were picked alphabetically, without regard to human relations. Sociometric tests, in which each man stated his most and least preferred choices of partner, were set up; and the degrees of interrelationship among members of "elements" of five to seven men were mathematically expressed. On the basis of the tests, it was possible to place nearly all cadets with compatible partners. A man's status in the whole group was also computed by comparing his fellow's acceptances and rejections of him.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信