Karla K Stuebing, Amy E Barth, Peter J Molfese, Brandon Weiss, Jack M Fletcher
{"title":"智商与阅读教学的反应关系不大：Meta-Analytic Interpretation.","authors":"Karla K Stuebing, Amy E Barth, Peter J Molfese, Brandon Weiss, Jack M Fletcher","doi":"10.1177/001440290907600102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A meta-analysis of 22 studies evaluating the relation of different assessments of IQ and intervention response did not support the hypothesis that IQ is an important predictor of response to instruction. We found an R(2) of .03 in models with IQ and the autoregressor as predictors and a unique lower estimated R(2) of .006 and a higher estimated R(2) of .013 in models with IQ, the autoregressor, and additional covariates as predictors. There was no evidence that these aggregated effect sizes were moderated by variables such as the type of IQ measure, outcome, age, or intervention. In simulations of the capacity of variables with effect sizes of .03 and .001 for predicting response to intervention, we found little evidence of practical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"76 1","pages":"31-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2836021/pdf/nihms152885.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IQ Is Not Strongly Related to Response to Reading Instruction: A Meta-Analytic Interpretation.\",\"authors\":\"Karla K Stuebing, Amy E Barth, Peter J Molfese, Brandon Weiss, Jack M Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/001440290907600102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A meta-analysis of 22 studies evaluating the relation of different assessments of IQ and intervention response did not support the hypothesis that IQ is an important predictor of response to instruction. We found an R(2) of .03 in models with IQ and the autoregressor as predictors and a unique lower estimated R(2) of .006 and a higher estimated R(2) of .013 in models with IQ, the autoregressor, and additional covariates as predictors. There was no evidence that these aggregated effect sizes were moderated by variables such as the type of IQ measure, outcome, age, or intervention. In simulations of the capacity of variables with effect sizes of .03 and .001 for predicting response to intervention, we found little evidence of practical significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptional Children\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"31-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2836021/pdf/nihms152885.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptional Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907600102\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907600102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
IQ Is Not Strongly Related to Response to Reading Instruction: A Meta-Analytic Interpretation.
A meta-analysis of 22 studies evaluating the relation of different assessments of IQ and intervention response did not support the hypothesis that IQ is an important predictor of response to instruction. We found an R(2) of .03 in models with IQ and the autoregressor as predictors and a unique lower estimated R(2) of .006 and a higher estimated R(2) of .013 in models with IQ, the autoregressor, and additional covariates as predictors. There was no evidence that these aggregated effect sizes were moderated by variables such as the type of IQ measure, outcome, age, or intervention. In simulations of the capacity of variables with effect sizes of .03 and .001 for predicting response to intervention, we found little evidence of practical significance.
期刊介绍：
Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
