临床医生对使用插曲分组与医疗保险索赔数据的反馈。

Health Care Financing Review Pub Date : 2010-01-01
Fred Thomas, Craig Caplan, Jesse M Levy, Marty Cohen, James Leonard, Todd Caldis, Curt Mueller
{"title":"临床医生对使用插曲分组与医疗保险索赔数据的反馈。","authors":"Fred Thomas,&nbsp;Craig Caplan,&nbsp;Jesse M Levy,&nbsp;Marty Cohen,&nbsp;James Leonard,&nbsp;Todd Caldis,&nbsp;Curt Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CMS is investigating techniques that might help identify costly physician practice patterns. One method presently under evaluation is to compare resource use for certain episodes of care using commercially available episode grouping software. Although this software has been used by the private sector to classify insured individuals' medical claims into episodes of care, it has never been used with fee-for-service Medicare claims except in the studies by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and CMS. This study reviews and reports on clinician feedback on the most obvious and important decisions that must be faced by Medicare to use grouped claims data as the foundation for a physician performance measurement system. The panel reactions show the importance of bringing persons with clinical knowledge into the development process. The clinician feedback confirms that additional research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55071,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Financing Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"51-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician feedback on using episode groupers with Medicare claims data.\",\"authors\":\"Fred Thomas,&nbsp;Craig Caplan,&nbsp;Jesse M Levy,&nbsp;Marty Cohen,&nbsp;James Leonard,&nbsp;Todd Caldis,&nbsp;Curt Mueller\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>CMS is investigating techniques that might help identify costly physician practice patterns. One method presently under evaluation is to compare resource use for certain episodes of care using commercially available episode grouping software. Although this software has been used by the private sector to classify insured individuals' medical claims into episodes of care, it has never been used with fee-for-service Medicare claims except in the studies by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and CMS. This study reviews and reports on clinician feedback on the most obvious and important decisions that must be faced by Medicare to use grouped claims data as the foundation for a physician performance measurement system. The panel reactions show the importance of bringing persons with clinical knowledge into the development process. The clinician feedback confirms that additional research is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Financing Review\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"51-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195067/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Financing Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Financing Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CMS正在研究可能有助于识别昂贵的医生实践模式的技术。目前正在评估的一种方法是使用市售的集分组软件比较某些集的护理资源使用情况。尽管该软件已被私营部门用于将被保险人的医疗索赔分类为护理事件,但除了在医疗保险支付咨询委员会(MedPAC)和CMS的研究中,它从未被用于按服务收费的医疗保险索赔。本研究回顾并报告了临床医生对医疗保险使用分组索赔数据作为医生绩效评估系统基础所必须面对的最明显和最重要决策的反馈。小组反应显示了将具有临床知识的人员引入开发过程的重要性。临床医生的反馈证实需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinician feedback on using episode groupers with Medicare claims data.

CMS is investigating techniques that might help identify costly physician practice patterns. One method presently under evaluation is to compare resource use for certain episodes of care using commercially available episode grouping software. Although this software has been used by the private sector to classify insured individuals' medical claims into episodes of care, it has never been used with fee-for-service Medicare claims except in the studies by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and CMS. This study reviews and reports on clinician feedback on the most obvious and important decisions that must be faced by Medicare to use grouped claims data as the foundation for a physician performance measurement system. The panel reactions show the importance of bringing persons with clinical knowledge into the development process. The clinician feedback confirms that additional research is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Financing Review
Health Care Financing Review 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信