Luisa A Wetta, Kimberly A Gerten, Thomas L Wheeler, Robert L Holley, R Edward Varner, Holly E Richter
{"title":"合成移植物在阴道脱垂手术中的应用:客观和主观结果。","authors":"Luisa A Wetta, Kimberly A Gerten, Thomas L Wheeler, Robert L Holley, R Edward Varner, Holly E Richter","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study reports 1-year outcomes in women who underwent transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery with Prolift transvaginal mesh.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and postoperative objective vaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and subjective symptom and impact assessments (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ)-7, respectively) were performed. Postoperative vaginal tenderness, stricture, and patient satisfaction were also obtained. Paired t tests were utilized for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 61.8 +/- 9.8 years; mean follow-up interval was 425.0 +/- 80.0 days (range, 237-717). POP-Q measurements of Ba, Bp, and C were significantly improved (all p values <or= 0.001). PFDI and PFIQ subscale scores significantly improved (all p values <or= 0.004). Thirty-five of 48 (73%) were completely satisfied, and two (4%) were not satisfied. Complications (n (percent)) included graft exposure (1 (2%)), dyspareunia (2 (4%)), and granulation tissue (3 (6%)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women undergoing transvaginal repair of POP with the Prolift mesh system showed significant improvement in 1-year anatomic and subjective measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"20 11","pages":"1307-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthetic graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery: objective and subjective outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Luisa A Wetta, Kimberly A Gerten, Thomas L Wheeler, Robert L Holley, R Edward Varner, Holly E Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study reports 1-year outcomes in women who underwent transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery with Prolift transvaginal mesh.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and postoperative objective vaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and subjective symptom and impact assessments (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ)-7, respectively) were performed. Postoperative vaginal tenderness, stricture, and patient satisfaction were also obtained. Paired t tests were utilized for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 61.8 +/- 9.8 years; mean follow-up interval was 425.0 +/- 80.0 days (range, 237-717). POP-Q measurements of Ba, Bp, and C were significantly improved (all p values <or= 0.001). PFDI and PFIQ subscale scores significantly improved (all p values <or= 0.004). Thirty-five of 48 (73%) were completely satisfied, and two (4%) were not satisfied. Complications (n (percent)) included graft exposure (1 (2%)), dyspareunia (2 (4%)), and granulation tissue (3 (6%)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women undergoing transvaginal repair of POP with the Prolift mesh system showed significant improvement in 1-year anatomic and subjective measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"volume\":\"20 11\",\"pages\":\"1307-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synthetic graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery: objective and subjective outcomes.
Introduction and hypothesis: This study reports 1-year outcomes in women who underwent transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery with Prolift transvaginal mesh.
Methods: Pre- and postoperative objective vaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and subjective symptom and impact assessments (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ)-7, respectively) were performed. Postoperative vaginal tenderness, stricture, and patient satisfaction were also obtained. Paired t tests were utilized for analysis.
Results: Mean age was 61.8 +/- 9.8 years; mean follow-up interval was 425.0 +/- 80.0 days (range, 237-717). POP-Q measurements of Ba, Bp, and C were significantly improved (all p values
Conclusions: Women undergoing transvaginal repair of POP with the Prolift mesh system showed significant improvement in 1-year anatomic and subjective measures.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
