简介:为“科学”心理学诞生的比较史。

Guido Cimino
{"title":"简介:为“科学”心理学诞生的比较史。","authors":"Guido Cimino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This introduction to the Proceedings of the Beijing Symposium poses the problem of the birth of a \"new psychology\" that endeavors to become a science, considered within the cultural, scientific, social, and institutional context of each country. This problem can be subdivided into a series of other more specific questions, dealt with in part by the volume's contributions: the distinction between a \"scientific\" psychology and a \"pre-scientific\" one; the historical reconstruction of psychology as a \"science,\" and of psychology as a \"discipline\" embedded in some institution; the time span in which the passage from the \"old\" to the \"new\" was achieved; the scientific-cultural and political-economic-social factors or conditions that influenced and favoured this birth. After a panoramic and \"comparative\" glance at the situation in different European countries (Germany, France, England, Italy, Spain, and Russia) and some extra-European ones (United States, Brazil, Japan, and China), as presented in the texts of these Proceedings, there follow some considerations of a general nature that attempt to highlight analogies and differences in the historical development of the origin of \"scientific\" psychology in the various countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":82321,"journal":{"name":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","volume":"43 1-2","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: for a comparative history of the birth of \\\"scientific\\\" psychology.\",\"authors\":\"Guido Cimino\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This introduction to the Proceedings of the Beijing Symposium poses the problem of the birth of a \\\"new psychology\\\" that endeavors to become a science, considered within the cultural, scientific, social, and institutional context of each country. This problem can be subdivided into a series of other more specific questions, dealt with in part by the volume's contributions: the distinction between a \\\"scientific\\\" psychology and a \\\"pre-scientific\\\" one; the historical reconstruction of psychology as a \\\"science,\\\" and of psychology as a \\\"discipline\\\" embedded in some institution; the time span in which the passage from the \\\"old\\\" to the \\\"new\\\" was achieved; the scientific-cultural and political-economic-social factors or conditions that influenced and favoured this birth. After a panoramic and \\\"comparative\\\" glance at the situation in different European countries (Germany, France, England, Italy, Spain, and Russia) and some extra-European ones (United States, Brazil, Japan, and China), as presented in the texts of these Proceedings, there follow some considerations of a general nature that attempt to highlight analogies and differences in the historical development of the origin of \\\"scientific\\\" psychology in the various countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":82321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza\",\"volume\":\"43 1-2\",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇《北京研讨会论文集》的引言提出了一个“新心理学”的诞生问题,它努力成为一门科学,在每个国家的文化、科学、社会和制度背景下进行考虑。这个问题可以细分为一系列其他更具体的问题,部分处理由卷的贡献:“科学”心理学和“前科学”的区别;心理学作为一门“科学”的历史重建,以及心理学作为一门嵌入某些机构的“学科”的历史重建;从“旧”过渡到“新”的时间跨度;影响和促进这一诞生的科学文化和政治经济社会因素或条件。在对不同的欧洲国家(德国、法国、英国、意大利、西班牙和俄罗斯)和一些欧洲以外的国家(美国、巴西、日本和中国)的情况进行全景和“比较”的一瞥之后,在这些会议记录的文本中,有一些一般性的考虑,试图突出各国“科学”心理学起源的历史发展的相似性和差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction: for a comparative history of the birth of "scientific" psychology.

This introduction to the Proceedings of the Beijing Symposium poses the problem of the birth of a "new psychology" that endeavors to become a science, considered within the cultural, scientific, social, and institutional context of each country. This problem can be subdivided into a series of other more specific questions, dealt with in part by the volume's contributions: the distinction between a "scientific" psychology and a "pre-scientific" one; the historical reconstruction of psychology as a "science," and of psychology as a "discipline" embedded in some institution; the time span in which the passage from the "old" to the "new" was achieved; the scientific-cultural and political-economic-social factors or conditions that influenced and favoured this birth. After a panoramic and "comparative" glance at the situation in different European countries (Germany, France, England, Italy, Spain, and Russia) and some extra-European ones (United States, Brazil, Japan, and China), as presented in the texts of these Proceedings, there follow some considerations of a general nature that attempt to highlight analogies and differences in the historical development of the origin of "scientific" psychology in the various countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信