意大利实证主义哲学与精神病学传统之间“科学”心理学的出现。

Guido Cimino
{"title":"意大利实证主义哲学与精神病学传统之间“科学”心理学的出现。","authors":"Guido Cimino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Italy, the emergence of a psychology that can be considered \"scientific\" is not an event that can be easily ascribed to a precise date. It involves instead a general shift of ideas, gradual initiatives of a cultural and institutional nature, and new approaches to research, all of which together, in the course of the last thirty years of the nineteenth century and the first decade of the twentieth century, form a \"critical mass\" that identifies psychology as an autonomous science, distinct from both philosophy and from neurophysiology and psychiatry. This event is embedded in--and favoured by--a matrix of positivist and evolutionist thought, which gives rise to the necessity and to the problem of confronting the study of mental phenomena with a \"positive method,\" and therefore of detaching such phenomena from their philosophical grounds in order to lead them within the sphere of science. Among the numerous elaborations upon this theme, the works that occupy a particularly prominent place are those of the positivist philosopher Roberto Ardigò and of the anthropologist Giuseppe Sergi, who in view of their theoretical proposal of a \"new\" science of the mind are considered the precursors or pioneers of \"scientific\" psychology in Italy. The same positivist philosophical-cultural background simultaneously induced some psychiatrists to open their mental health centres to the first researches of a strictly psychological nature to be conducted with the experimental method. In this regard, a particularly important figure is that of Gabriele Buccola, who was especially dedicated to these investigations and was the first Italian scholar to approach in a systematic way experimental research on mental phenomena. Little by little, in the years bridging the two centuries, a second generation of scholars, for the most part psychiatrists by formation (among whom Ferrari, De Sanctis, Kiesow, and De Sarlo), began to hold lessons of experimental psychology in the universities, to open laboratories specifically dedicated to psychological research, to develop experimental investigations inspired by different models, and to draft the first applications of the discipline in the clinical, educational, labour, and judiciary fields. Considered as a whole, the numerous initiatives undertaken indicate clearly how in those years--and especially in 1905 when several very significant events took place simultaneously--a new psychological science was definitively born also in Italy.</p>","PeriodicalId":82321,"journal":{"name":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","volume":"43 1-2","pages":"187-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The emergence of \\\"scientific\\\" psychology in Italy between positivist philosophy and psychiatric tradition.\",\"authors\":\"Guido Cimino\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Italy, the emergence of a psychology that can be considered \\\"scientific\\\" is not an event that can be easily ascribed to a precise date. It involves instead a general shift of ideas, gradual initiatives of a cultural and institutional nature, and new approaches to research, all of which together, in the course of the last thirty years of the nineteenth century and the first decade of the twentieth century, form a \\\"critical mass\\\" that identifies psychology as an autonomous science, distinct from both philosophy and from neurophysiology and psychiatry. This event is embedded in--and favoured by--a matrix of positivist and evolutionist thought, which gives rise to the necessity and to the problem of confronting the study of mental phenomena with a \\\"positive method,\\\" and therefore of detaching such phenomena from their philosophical grounds in order to lead them within the sphere of science. Among the numerous elaborations upon this theme, the works that occupy a particularly prominent place are those of the positivist philosopher Roberto Ardigò and of the anthropologist Giuseppe Sergi, who in view of their theoretical proposal of a \\\"new\\\" science of the mind are considered the precursors or pioneers of \\\"scientific\\\" psychology in Italy. The same positivist philosophical-cultural background simultaneously induced some psychiatrists to open their mental health centres to the first researches of a strictly psychological nature to be conducted with the experimental method. In this regard, a particularly important figure is that of Gabriele Buccola, who was especially dedicated to these investigations and was the first Italian scholar to approach in a systematic way experimental research on mental phenomena. Little by little, in the years bridging the two centuries, a second generation of scholars, for the most part psychiatrists by formation (among whom Ferrari, De Sanctis, Kiesow, and De Sarlo), began to hold lessons of experimental psychology in the universities, to open laboratories specifically dedicated to psychological research, to develop experimental investigations inspired by different models, and to draft the first applications of the discipline in the clinical, educational, labour, and judiciary fields. Considered as a whole, the numerous initiatives undertaken indicate clearly how in those years--and especially in 1905 when several very significant events took place simultaneously--a new psychological science was definitively born also in Italy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":82321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza\",\"volume\":\"43 1-2\",\"pages\":\"187-219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在意大利,一种可以被认为是“科学”的心理学的出现并不是一个可以轻易归因于一个精确日期的事件。相反,它涉及到观念的普遍转变,文化和制度性质的逐步倡议,以及新的研究方法,所有这些,在19世纪最后30年和20世纪头十年的过程中,共同形成了一个“临界质量”,将心理学视为一门独立的科学,与哲学、神经生理学和精神病学都不同。这一事件植根于实证主义和进化主义思想的母体中,并受到其支持,这就产生了用一种“实证方法”来面对心理现象研究的必要性和问题,因此也就产生了将这些现象从它们的哲学基础中分离出来,以便将它们引入科学领域的问题。在关于这一主题的众多阐述中,实证主义哲学家Roberto Ardigò和人类学家Giuseppe Sergi的作品占据了特别突出的地位,他们从理论上提出了一种“新的”心灵科学,被认为是意大利“科学”心理学的先驱或先驱。同样的实证主义哲学文化背景同时促使一些精神科医生开放他们的心理健康中心,以实验方法进行第一次严格的心理学性质的研究。在这方面,加布里埃尔·布科拉是一个特别重要的人物,他特别致力于这些调查,是第一个以系统的方式对心理现象进行实验研究的意大利学者。渐渐地,在这两个世纪之间的桥梁上,第二代学者,大部分是精神科医生(其中包括法拉利、德桑科斯、基索夫和德萨洛)开始在大学里开设实验心理学课程,开设专门用于心理学研究的实验室,在不同模型的启发下开展实验调查,并起草了该学科在临床、教育、劳动、还有司法领域。从整体上看,所采取的众多举措清楚地表明,在那些年里,特别是在1905年,当几个非常重要的事件同时发生时,一门新的心理科学也在意大利确切地诞生了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The emergence of "scientific" psychology in Italy between positivist philosophy and psychiatric tradition.

In Italy, the emergence of a psychology that can be considered "scientific" is not an event that can be easily ascribed to a precise date. It involves instead a general shift of ideas, gradual initiatives of a cultural and institutional nature, and new approaches to research, all of which together, in the course of the last thirty years of the nineteenth century and the first decade of the twentieth century, form a "critical mass" that identifies psychology as an autonomous science, distinct from both philosophy and from neurophysiology and psychiatry. This event is embedded in--and favoured by--a matrix of positivist and evolutionist thought, which gives rise to the necessity and to the problem of confronting the study of mental phenomena with a "positive method," and therefore of detaching such phenomena from their philosophical grounds in order to lead them within the sphere of science. Among the numerous elaborations upon this theme, the works that occupy a particularly prominent place are those of the positivist philosopher Roberto Ardigò and of the anthropologist Giuseppe Sergi, who in view of their theoretical proposal of a "new" science of the mind are considered the precursors or pioneers of "scientific" psychology in Italy. The same positivist philosophical-cultural background simultaneously induced some psychiatrists to open their mental health centres to the first researches of a strictly psychological nature to be conducted with the experimental method. In this regard, a particularly important figure is that of Gabriele Buccola, who was especially dedicated to these investigations and was the first Italian scholar to approach in a systematic way experimental research on mental phenomena. Little by little, in the years bridging the two centuries, a second generation of scholars, for the most part psychiatrists by formation (among whom Ferrari, De Sanctis, Kiesow, and De Sarlo), began to hold lessons of experimental psychology in the universities, to open laboratories specifically dedicated to psychological research, to develop experimental investigations inspired by different models, and to draft the first applications of the discipline in the clinical, educational, labour, and judiciary fields. Considered as a whole, the numerous initiatives undertaken indicate clearly how in those years--and especially in 1905 when several very significant events took place simultaneously--a new psychological science was definitively born also in Italy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信