基于脉冲传递时间技术的无袖扣血压评估:对血压正常者为期半年的研究。

Mico Yee-Man Wong, Carmen Chung-Yan Poon, Yuan-Ting Zhang
{"title":"基于脉冲传递时间技术的无袖扣血压评估:对血压正常者为期半年的研究。","authors":"Mico Yee-Man Wong,&nbsp;Carmen Chung-Yan Poon,&nbsp;Yuan-Ting Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10558-009-9070-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present study, we investigated the relationship between blood pressure (BP) and pulse transit time (PTT) and evaluated the accuracy of the PTT-based cuffless BP estimation on 14 normotensive subjects. Least-squares regression was used to estimate BP in the first test and a repeatability test carried out half year later. BP in the repeatability test was also estimated using the regression coefficients in the first test. The results illustrated that in the first and repeatability tests (1) arterial BP increased and PTT decreased acutely after the exercises and (2) systolic BP was highly correlated with PTT. In the repeatability test, the estimation differences from the references were 0.0 +/- 5.3 mmHg and 0.0 +/- 2.9 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BPs respectively using least-squares regression. However, the estimation differences increased to 1.4 +/- 10.2 mmHg and 2.1 +/- 7.3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BPs, respectively when the regression coefficients in the first test were used for prediction. In summary, reasonable BP estimations were given in the first and repeatability tests but not using the regression coefficients obtained 6 months ago for some subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":55275,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","volume":"9 1","pages":"32-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10558-009-9070-7","citationCount":"162","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of the cuffless blood pressure estimation based on pulse transit time technique: a half year study on normotensive subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Mico Yee-Man Wong,&nbsp;Carmen Chung-Yan Poon,&nbsp;Yuan-Ting Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10558-009-9070-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the present study, we investigated the relationship between blood pressure (BP) and pulse transit time (PTT) and evaluated the accuracy of the PTT-based cuffless BP estimation on 14 normotensive subjects. Least-squares regression was used to estimate BP in the first test and a repeatability test carried out half year later. BP in the repeatability test was also estimated using the regression coefficients in the first test. The results illustrated that in the first and repeatability tests (1) arterial BP increased and PTT decreased acutely after the exercises and (2) systolic BP was highly correlated with PTT. In the repeatability test, the estimation differences from the references were 0.0 +/- 5.3 mmHg and 0.0 +/- 2.9 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BPs respectively using least-squares regression. However, the estimation differences increased to 1.4 +/- 10.2 mmHg and 2.1 +/- 7.3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BPs, respectively when the regression coefficients in the first test were used for prediction. In summary, reasonable BP estimations were given in the first and repeatability tests but not using the regression coefficients obtained 6 months ago for some subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"32-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10558-009-9070-7\",\"citationCount\":\"162\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-009-9070-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-009-9070-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 162

摘要

在本研究中,我们研究了血压(BP)与脉搏传递时间(PTT)之间的关系,并评估了基于PTT的无袖扣血压估计的准确性。在第一次测试中使用最小二乘回归估计BP,并在半年后进行重复性测试。重复试验中的BP也使用第一次试验的回归系数进行估计。结果表明,在第一次试验和重复性试验中:(1)运动后动脉血压急剧升高,PTT急剧下降;(2)收缩压与PTT高度相关。在重复性测试中,使用最小二乘回归,与参考文献的收缩压和舒张压估计差异分别为0.0 +/- 5.3 mmHg和0.0 +/- 2.9 mmHg。然而,当使用第一次试验中的回归系数进行预测时,收缩压和舒张压的估计差异分别增加到1.4 +/- 10.2 mmHg和2.1 +/- 7.3 mmHg。综上所述,在第一次测试和重复性测试中给出了合理的BP估计,但没有使用6个月前获得的回归系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of the cuffless blood pressure estimation based on pulse transit time technique: a half year study on normotensive subjects.

In the present study, we investigated the relationship between blood pressure (BP) and pulse transit time (PTT) and evaluated the accuracy of the PTT-based cuffless BP estimation on 14 normotensive subjects. Least-squares regression was used to estimate BP in the first test and a repeatability test carried out half year later. BP in the repeatability test was also estimated using the regression coefficients in the first test. The results illustrated that in the first and repeatability tests (1) arterial BP increased and PTT decreased acutely after the exercises and (2) systolic BP was highly correlated with PTT. In the repeatability test, the estimation differences from the references were 0.0 +/- 5.3 mmHg and 0.0 +/- 2.9 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BPs respectively using least-squares regression. However, the estimation differences increased to 1.4 +/- 10.2 mmHg and 2.1 +/- 7.3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BPs, respectively when the regression coefficients in the first test were used for prediction. In summary, reasonable BP estimations were given in the first and repeatability tests but not using the regression coefficients obtained 6 months ago for some subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信