州宪法——同性关系——密歇根州最高法院认为，公共雇主不得向雇员的同性家庭伴侣提供医疗福利。-工作中的民族自豪感公司诉密歇根州州长案，748 N.W.2d 524(2008年密歇根州)。

IF 3.5 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Harvard Law Review Pub Date : 2009-02-01

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

State constitutional law - same-sex relations - Supreme Court of Michigan holds that public employers may not provide healthcare benefits to same-sex domestic partners of employees. - National Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan, 748 N.W.2d 524 (Mich. 2008).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Harvard Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

11.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations. Aside from serving as an important academic forum for legal scholarship, the Review has two other goals. First, the journal is designed to be an effective research tool for practicing lawyers and students of the law. Second, it provides opportunities for Review members to develop their own editing and writing skills. Accordingly, each issue contains pieces by student editors as well as outside authors. The Review publishes articles by professors, judges, and practitioners and solicits reviews of important recent books from recognized experts. All articles — even those by the most respected authorities — are subjected to a rigorous editorial process designed to sharpen and strengthen substance and tone.