新的法规会扭转顺势疗法的“下降”吗?

Lizzy Hay
{"title":"新的法规会扭转顺势疗法的“下降”吗?","authors":"Lizzy Hay","doi":"10.1177/14664240081280061201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use and regulation of homeopathy has long been the focus of debate, lacking as it does in scientific evidence of its clinical effectiveness. Claimed to be 'harmless', it is often argued that there is no reason for it not to be used in conjunction with conventional treatments, and that there is the possibility that it may be beneficial. Lizzy Hay discusses whether in fact patients are at risk from this 'harmless' treatment if their confidence stretches to using homeopathy solely as an alternative treatment when really only 'a spoonful' should be taken to help the conventional medicine go down.</p>","PeriodicalId":22790,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health","volume":"128 6","pages":"282-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14664240081280061201","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Will new regulations reverse the 'drop' in homeopathy?\",\"authors\":\"Lizzy Hay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14664240081280061201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use and regulation of homeopathy has long been the focus of debate, lacking as it does in scientific evidence of its clinical effectiveness. Claimed to be 'harmless', it is often argued that there is no reason for it not to be used in conjunction with conventional treatments, and that there is the possibility that it may be beneficial. Lizzy Hay discusses whether in fact patients are at risk from this 'harmless' treatment if their confidence stretches to using homeopathy solely as an alternative treatment when really only 'a spoonful' should be taken to help the conventional medicine go down.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health\",\"volume\":\"128 6\",\"pages\":\"282-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14664240081280061201\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14664240081280061201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14664240081280061201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

顺势疗法的使用和管理长期以来一直是争论的焦点,缺乏其临床有效性的科学证据。它被认为是“无害的”,人们经常争辩说,没有理由不把它与传统治疗结合起来使用,而且它可能是有益的。Lizzy Hay讨论了如果病人对顺势疗法有信心,只把它当作一种替代疗法,而实际上只需要服用“一勺”就能帮助传统药物药效下降,那么这种“无害”的疗法是否真的会给他们带来风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Will new regulations reverse the 'drop' in homeopathy?

The use and regulation of homeopathy has long been the focus of debate, lacking as it does in scientific evidence of its clinical effectiveness. Claimed to be 'harmless', it is often argued that there is no reason for it not to be used in conjunction with conventional treatments, and that there is the possibility that it may be beneficial. Lizzy Hay discusses whether in fact patients are at risk from this 'harmless' treatment if their confidence stretches to using homeopathy solely as an alternative treatment when really only 'a spoonful' should be taken to help the conventional medicine go down.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信