测定自动化试验程序等效性的统计方法。

K Rick Lung, Mary A Gorko, Jennifer Llewelyn, Norman Wiggins
{"title":"测定自动化试验程序等效性的统计方法。","authors":"K Rick Lung,&nbsp;Mary A Gorko,&nbsp;Jennifer Llewelyn,&nbsp;Norman Wiggins","doi":"10.1155/S146392460300021X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the development of test methods for solid dosage forms, manual test procedures for assay and content uniformity often precede the development of automated test procedures. Since the mode of extraction for automated test methods is often slightly different from that of the manual test method, additional validation of an automated test method is usually required. In addition to compliance with validation guidelines, developers of automated test methods are often asked to demonstrate equivalence between the manual and automated test methods. There are problems associated with using the traditional zero-difference hypothesis tests (such as the Student's t-test) for demonstrating equivalence. The use of the Westlake Interval and Schuirmann's Two One-sided test as more rigorous methods of demonstrating equivalence is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Automated Methods & Management in Chemistry","volume":"25 6","pages":"123-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/S146392460300021X","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical method for the determination of equivalence of automated test procedures.\",\"authors\":\"K Rick Lung,&nbsp;Mary A Gorko,&nbsp;Jennifer Llewelyn,&nbsp;Norman Wiggins\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/S146392460300021X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the development of test methods for solid dosage forms, manual test procedures for assay and content uniformity often precede the development of automated test procedures. Since the mode of extraction for automated test methods is often slightly different from that of the manual test method, additional validation of an automated test method is usually required. In addition to compliance with validation guidelines, developers of automated test methods are often asked to demonstrate equivalence between the manual and automated test methods. There are problems associated with using the traditional zero-difference hypothesis tests (such as the Student's t-test) for demonstrating equivalence. The use of the Westlake Interval and Schuirmann's Two One-sided test as more rigorous methods of demonstrating equivalence is discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Automated Methods & Management in Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"25 6\",\"pages\":\"123-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/S146392460300021X\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Automated Methods & Management in Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/S146392460300021X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Automated Methods & Management in Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/S146392460300021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

在固体剂型测试方法的开发中,测定和含量均匀性的手动测试程序通常先于自动化测试程序的开发。由于自动测试方法的提取模式通常与手动测试方法略有不同,因此通常需要对自动测试方法进行额外的验证。除了遵循验证指南之外,自动化测试方法的开发人员经常被要求证明手动和自动化测试方法之间的等价性。使用传统的零差异假设检验(如学生t检验)来证明等效性存在一些问题。讨论了使用西湖区间和Schuirmann的双单侧检验作为证明等效性的更严格的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical method for the determination of equivalence of automated test procedures.

In the development of test methods for solid dosage forms, manual test procedures for assay and content uniformity often precede the development of automated test procedures. Since the mode of extraction for automated test methods is often slightly different from that of the manual test method, additional validation of an automated test method is usually required. In addition to compliance with validation guidelines, developers of automated test methods are often asked to demonstrate equivalence between the manual and automated test methods. There are problems associated with using the traditional zero-difference hypothesis tests (such as the Student's t-test) for demonstrating equivalence. The use of the Westlake Interval and Schuirmann's Two One-sided test as more rigorous methods of demonstrating equivalence is discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信