伦理和循证医学:有冲突吗?

Erich H Loewy
{"title":"伦理和循证医学:有冲突吗?","authors":"Erich H Loewy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article addresses the advantages, disadvantages, and traps to which evidence-based medicine (EBM) may lead and suggests that, to be ethically valid, EBM must be aimed at the patient's best interests and not at the financial interests of others. While financial considerations are by no means trivial, it is hypocritical - if not dangerous - to hide them behind words like \"evidence\" or \"quality.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":74137,"journal":{"name":"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine","volume":"9 3","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2100103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics and evidence-based medicine: is there a conflict?\",\"authors\":\"Erich H Loewy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article addresses the advantages, disadvantages, and traps to which evidence-based medicine (EBM) may lead and suggests that, to be ethically valid, EBM must be aimed at the patient's best interests and not at the financial interests of others. While financial considerations are by no means trivial, it is hypocritical - if not dangerous - to hide them behind words like \\\"evidence\\\" or \\\"quality.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2100103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文阐述了循证医学(EBM)可能导致的优点、缺点和陷阱,并建议,为了在伦理上有效,循证医学必须以患者的最佳利益为目标,而不是以他人的经济利益为目标。虽然经济上的考虑绝不是微不足道的,但把它们隐藏在诸如“证据”或“质量”之类的词语后面,即使不是危险的,也是虚伪的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethics and evidence-based medicine: is there a conflict?

This article addresses the advantages, disadvantages, and traps to which evidence-based medicine (EBM) may lead and suggests that, to be ethically valid, EBM must be aimed at the patient's best interests and not at the financial interests of others. While financial considerations are by no means trivial, it is hypocritical - if not dangerous - to hide them behind words like "evidence" or "quality."

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信