2004年合成类固醇控制法:药物政策的政治经济学研究。

Bryan E Denham
{"title":"2004年合成类固醇控制法:药物政策的政治经济学研究。","authors":"Bryan E Denham","doi":"10.1300/J045v22n02_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the processes by which the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004, an act that added steroid precursors such as androstenedione to the list of Schedule III Controlled Substances in the United States, came to pass in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Grounded theoretically in political economy, the article addresses, in the abstract, how the interplay of political pressures and economic influences stands to affect the actions of public officials, and how \"tougher\" drug policies-those touted to be more substantive and efficacious than existing regulations-often fail to effect change. The article concludes with implications for those involved in the regulation of anabolic steroids and steroid precursors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":"22 2","pages":"51-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v22n02_04","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004: a study in the political economy of drug policy.\",\"authors\":\"Bryan E Denham\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J045v22n02_04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article examines the processes by which the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004, an act that added steroid precursors such as androstenedione to the list of Schedule III Controlled Substances in the United States, came to pass in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Grounded theoretically in political economy, the article addresses, in the abstract, how the interplay of political pressures and economic influences stands to affect the actions of public officials, and how \\\"tougher\\\" drug policies-those touted to be more substantive and efficacious than existing regulations-often fail to effect change. The article concludes with implications for those involved in the regulation of anabolic steroids and steroid precursors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"51-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v22n02_04\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v22n02_04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v22n02_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本文考察了2004年《合成代谢类固醇控制法》的过程,该法案将类固醇前体(如雄烯二酮)添加到美国附表III受控物质清单中,并在众议院和参议院获得通过。这篇文章以政治经济学理论为基础,抽象地阐述了政治压力和经济影响之间的相互作用是如何影响政府官员的行为的,以及“更严厉”的毒品政策——那些被吹捧为比现有法规更实质性、更有效的政策——是如何常常无法产生改变的。文章总结了对那些参与合成代谢类固醇和类固醇前体调节的人的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004: a study in the political economy of drug policy.

This article examines the processes by which the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004, an act that added steroid precursors such as androstenedione to the list of Schedule III Controlled Substances in the United States, came to pass in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Grounded theoretically in political economy, the article addresses, in the abstract, how the interplay of political pressures and economic influences stands to affect the actions of public officials, and how "tougher" drug policies-those touted to be more substantive and efficacious than existing regulations-often fail to effect change. The article concludes with implications for those involved in the regulation of anabolic steroids and steroid precursors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信