研究检查了儿科研究的最低风险标准。

The journal of biolaw & business Pub Date : 2006-01-01
Arlene D Luu
{"title":"研究检查了儿科研究的最低风险标准。","authors":"Arlene D Luu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The \"minimal\" risk standard for protection of pediatric research subjects often fails due to unclear definitions and uneven IRB application, requiring an alternative standard to better assist pediatric research assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":83088,"journal":{"name":"The journal of biolaw & business","volume":"9 1","pages":"52-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research examines the minimal risk standard for pediatric research.\",\"authors\":\"Arlene D Luu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The \\\"minimal\\\" risk standard for protection of pediatric research subjects often fails due to unclear definitions and uneven IRB application, requiring an alternative standard to better assist pediatric research assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of biolaw & business\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"52-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of biolaw & business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of biolaw & business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护儿科研究受试者的“最小”风险标准往往由于定义不明确和IRB应用不均衡而失败,需要一个替代标准来更好地协助儿科研究评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research examines the minimal risk standard for pediatric research.

The "minimal" risk standard for protection of pediatric research subjects often fails due to unclear definitions and uneven IRB application, requiring an alternative standard to better assist pediatric research assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信