LigaSure小颌骨与传统颈部剥离:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2
Tai-Yu Chen, Li-Jen Hsin, Wan-Ni Lin, Ming-Shao Tsai, Yao-Te Tsai, Yi-Chan Lee
{"title":"LigaSure小颌骨与传统颈部剥离:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tai-Yu Chen,&nbsp;Li-Jen Hsin,&nbsp;Wan-Ni Lin,&nbsp;Ming-Shao Tsai,&nbsp;Yao-Te Tsai,&nbsp;Yi-Chan Lee","doi":"10.1186/s40463-021-00504-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neck dissection has a central role in the management of head and neck cancers. This systematic review aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative parameters between conventional and LigaSure Small Jaw (LSJ)-assisted neck dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. independently by two authors for relevant articles comparing the outcomes of conventional and LSJ-assisted neck dissection. Data from each study were extracted, and a random-effects model was used in the pooled analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with conventional techniques, LSJ-assisted neck dissection was associated with a significantly reduced operative time. The rates of postoperative hematoma, infection, amount of intraoperative blood loss, the length of hospital stay and the drainage amount showed no significant intergroup differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The meta-analysis provides evidence that properly using LSJ may reduce the operative time compared with that of conventional techniques. Surgeons may consider using LSJ in neck dissection according to personal experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":520683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","volume":" ","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40463-021-00504-2","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LigaSure small jaw versus conventional neck dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tai-Yu Chen,&nbsp;Li-Jen Hsin,&nbsp;Wan-Ni Lin,&nbsp;Ming-Shao Tsai,&nbsp;Yao-Te Tsai,&nbsp;Yi-Chan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40463-021-00504-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neck dissection has a central role in the management of head and neck cancers. This systematic review aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative parameters between conventional and LigaSure Small Jaw (LSJ)-assisted neck dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. independently by two authors for relevant articles comparing the outcomes of conventional and LSJ-assisted neck dissection. Data from each study were extracted, and a random-effects model was used in the pooled analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with conventional techniques, LSJ-assisted neck dissection was associated with a significantly reduced operative time. The rates of postoperative hematoma, infection, amount of intraoperative blood loss, the length of hospital stay and the drainage amount showed no significant intergroup differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The meta-analysis provides evidence that properly using LSJ may reduce the operative time compared with that of conventional techniques. Surgeons may consider using LSJ in neck dissection according to personal experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40463-021-00504-2\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00504-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00504-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:颈部清扫在头颈癌的治疗中起着核心作用。本系统综述旨在比较常规和LigaSure小颌骨(LSJ)辅助颈部清扫术的术中和术后参数。方法:检索PubMed (MEDLINE)、Embase和Cochrane Library。由两位作者独立撰写相关文章,比较常规和lsj辅助颈部清扫的结果。从每个研究中提取数据,并使用随机效应模型进行合并分析。结果:与常规技术相比,lsj辅助下的颈部清扫术可显著缩短手术时间。术后血肿率、感染率、术中出血量、住院时间、引流量组间差异无统计学意义。结论:荟萃分析表明,与常规技术相比,正确使用LSJ可缩短手术时间。外科医生可根据个人经验考虑在颈部清扫中使用LSJ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

LigaSure small jaw versus conventional neck dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

LigaSure small jaw versus conventional neck dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

LigaSure small jaw versus conventional neck dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

LigaSure small jaw versus conventional neck dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Neck dissection has a central role in the management of head and neck cancers. This systematic review aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative parameters between conventional and LigaSure Small Jaw (LSJ)-assisted neck dissection.

Methods: PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. independently by two authors for relevant articles comparing the outcomes of conventional and LSJ-assisted neck dissection. Data from each study were extracted, and a random-effects model was used in the pooled analysis.

Results: Compared with conventional techniques, LSJ-assisted neck dissection was associated with a significantly reduced operative time. The rates of postoperative hematoma, infection, amount of intraoperative blood loss, the length of hospital stay and the drainage amount showed no significant intergroup differences.

Conclusions: The meta-analysis provides evidence that properly using LSJ may reduce the operative time compared with that of conventional techniques. Surgeons may consider using LSJ in neck dissection according to personal experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信