印度纵向和横向IIT的行业层面决定因素。

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Indian Economic Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-09 DOI:10.1007/s41775-021-00107-8
Sagnik Bagchi, Surajit Bhattacharyya
{"title":"印度纵向和横向IIT的行业层面决定因素。","authors":"Sagnik Bagchi,&nbsp;Surajit Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1007/s41775-021-00107-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper mitigates the gap in the Indian context about the non-consideration of <i>vertical</i> and <i>horizontal</i> intra-industry trade (IIT) distinctly in testing empirical hypotheses about industry-level determinants of IIT. Our study indicates that failure to segregate <i>vertical</i> and <i>horizontal</i> IIT from the <i>total</i> IIT possibly leads to potential <i>bias</i> in econometric results. Drawing on annual multilateral trade data encompassing two and half decades of the liberalization period, we find India's IIT outpaced the growth of inter-industry trade over the years and its contribution mainly came from <i>six</i> manufacturing industry groups whose export baskets had been loaded with <i>low</i> vertically differentiated goods. However, horizontal and <i>high</i> vertical IIT have gained some momentum since the end of the last decade. Given the <i>fractional</i> nature of our dependent variable, we initially estimate a (random effects) Tobit model followed by the Exponential Regression of Fractional Response model. The robust econometric findings show that product differentiation has a <i>positive</i> impact <i>only</i> on <i>total</i> IIT. Whereas vertical and horizontal IIT are promoted in industries with <i>concentrated</i> and <i>competitive</i> market structures, respectively. The prevalence of concentrated market structure indicates that (large) Indian firms sustain import competition by specializing in <i>low</i> vertically differentiated goods, as they efficiently adjust to resource reallocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36028,"journal":{"name":"Indian Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41775-021-00107-8","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industry-level determinants of India's vertical and horizontal IIT.\",\"authors\":\"Sagnik Bagchi,&nbsp;Surajit Bhattacharyya\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41775-021-00107-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper mitigates the gap in the Indian context about the non-consideration of <i>vertical</i> and <i>horizontal</i> intra-industry trade (IIT) distinctly in testing empirical hypotheses about industry-level determinants of IIT. Our study indicates that failure to segregate <i>vertical</i> and <i>horizontal</i> IIT from the <i>total</i> IIT possibly leads to potential <i>bias</i> in econometric results. Drawing on annual multilateral trade data encompassing two and half decades of the liberalization period, we find India's IIT outpaced the growth of inter-industry trade over the years and its contribution mainly came from <i>six</i> manufacturing industry groups whose export baskets had been loaded with <i>low</i> vertically differentiated goods. However, horizontal and <i>high</i> vertical IIT have gained some momentum since the end of the last decade. Given the <i>fractional</i> nature of our dependent variable, we initially estimate a (random effects) Tobit model followed by the Exponential Regression of Fractional Response model. The robust econometric findings show that product differentiation has a <i>positive</i> impact <i>only</i> on <i>total</i> IIT. Whereas vertical and horizontal IIT are promoted in industries with <i>concentrated</i> and <i>competitive</i> market structures, respectively. The prevalence of concentrated market structure indicates that (large) Indian firms sustain import competition by specializing in <i>low</i> vertically differentiated goods, as they efficiently adjust to resource reallocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Economic Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41775-021-00107-8\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41775-021-00107-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41775-021-00107-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文通过对产业内贸易决定因素的实证假设进行检验,明显缓解了印度背景下关于不考虑垂直和水平产业内贸易的差距。我们的研究表明,未能从总IIT中分离出垂直和水平的IIT可能会导致计量经济学结果的潜在偏差。利用涵盖自由化时期25年的年度多边贸易数据,我们发现印度的IIT多年来超过了产业间贸易的增长,其贡献主要来自六个制造业集团,这些集团的出口篮子中装满了低垂直差异化的商品。然而,自上个十年结束以来,水平和高垂直的IIT获得了一些动力。考虑到因变量的分数性质,我们首先估计一个(随机效应)Tobit模型,然后是分数响应模型的指数回归。稳健的计量经济学研究结果表明,产品差异化仅对总IIT有积极影响。而在市场结构集中和竞争激烈的行业,则分别促进纵向和横向的工业创新。集中式市场结构的普遍存在表明,(大型)印度公司通过专门从事低垂直差异化产品来维持进口竞争,因为它们有效地适应了资源再配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Industry-level determinants of India's vertical and horizontal IIT.

Industry-level determinants of India's vertical and horizontal IIT.

Industry-level determinants of India's vertical and horizontal IIT.

Industry-level determinants of India's vertical and horizontal IIT.

This paper mitigates the gap in the Indian context about the non-consideration of vertical and horizontal intra-industry trade (IIT) distinctly in testing empirical hypotheses about industry-level determinants of IIT. Our study indicates that failure to segregate vertical and horizontal IIT from the total IIT possibly leads to potential bias in econometric results. Drawing on annual multilateral trade data encompassing two and half decades of the liberalization period, we find India's IIT outpaced the growth of inter-industry trade over the years and its contribution mainly came from six manufacturing industry groups whose export baskets had been loaded with low vertically differentiated goods. However, horizontal and high vertical IIT have gained some momentum since the end of the last decade. Given the fractional nature of our dependent variable, we initially estimate a (random effects) Tobit model followed by the Exponential Regression of Fractional Response model. The robust econometric findings show that product differentiation has a positive impact only on total IIT. Whereas vertical and horizontal IIT are promoted in industries with concentrated and competitive market structures, respectively. The prevalence of concentrated market structure indicates that (large) Indian firms sustain import competition by specializing in low vertically differentiated goods, as they efficiently adjust to resource reallocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Economic Review
Indian Economic Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Indian Economic Review aims to provide a platform for dissemination of innovative research in economics that employs theoretical and empirical approaches. Original research in all areas of economics is welcome. These areas include but are not limited toAgricultural and resource economics Behavioural economics Development economics Economic theory Economics of health and education Environmental economics Experimental economics Game theory Industrial organisation International trade and finance Law and economics Macro and monetary economics Poverty and inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信