Scott R Coleman, Theodore J Cios, Steven Riela, S Michael Roberts
{"title":"异丙酚对左心室整体纵向应变的影响。","authors":"Scott R Coleman, Theodore J Cios, Steven Riela, S Michael Roberts","doi":"10.1177/1089253221991372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine if hemodynamic changes secondary to propofol administration are a result of direct myocardial depression as measured by global longitudinal strain (GLS). The authors hypothesized that propofol would cause a significant worsening in GLS, indicating direct myocardial depression.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, observational.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Endoscopy suite at a single academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients undergoing outpatient, elective endoscopic procedures at an outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Limited transthoracic echocardiograms were performed before and after patients received propofol for endoscopic procedures. Post-processing measurements included GLS, 2D (dimensional) ejection fraction (2D EF), and 3D EF. Using paired sample Student's <i>t</i> test, no statistically significant change in GLS, 2D EF, or 3D EF was found despite statistically significant hypotension. In fact, there was a trend toward more negative GLS (improved myocardial function) in patients after receiving propofol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found propofol did not cause a reduction in systolic function as measured by GLS, a sensitive measure of myocardial contractility. Therefore, decreases in blood pressure after a propofol bolus in spontaneously breathing patients are likely due to decreased vascular tone and not impaired left ventricular systolic function. These results should be considered in the management of propofol-induced hypotension for spontaneously breathing patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46500,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia","volume":"25 3","pages":"185-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1089253221991372","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Propofol on Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain.\",\"authors\":\"Scott R Coleman, Theodore J Cios, Steven Riela, S Michael Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1089253221991372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine if hemodynamic changes secondary to propofol administration are a result of direct myocardial depression as measured by global longitudinal strain (GLS). The authors hypothesized that propofol would cause a significant worsening in GLS, indicating direct myocardial depression.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, observational.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Endoscopy suite at a single academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients undergoing outpatient, elective endoscopic procedures at an outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Limited transthoracic echocardiograms were performed before and after patients received propofol for endoscopic procedures. Post-processing measurements included GLS, 2D (dimensional) ejection fraction (2D EF), and 3D EF. Using paired sample Student's <i>t</i> test, no statistically significant change in GLS, 2D EF, or 3D EF was found despite statistically significant hypotension. In fact, there was a trend toward more negative GLS (improved myocardial function) in patients after receiving propofol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found propofol did not cause a reduction in systolic function as measured by GLS, a sensitive measure of myocardial contractility. Therefore, decreases in blood pressure after a propofol bolus in spontaneously breathing patients are likely due to decreased vascular tone and not impaired left ventricular systolic function. These results should be considered in the management of propofol-induced hypotension for spontaneously breathing patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"185-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1089253221991372\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089253221991372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089253221991372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effects of Propofol on Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain.
Objectives: To determine if hemodynamic changes secondary to propofol administration are a result of direct myocardial depression as measured by global longitudinal strain (GLS). The authors hypothesized that propofol would cause a significant worsening in GLS, indicating direct myocardial depression.
Design: Prospective, observational.
Setting: Endoscopy suite at a single academic medical center.
Participants: Patients undergoing outpatient, elective endoscopic procedures at an outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care academic medical center.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Limited transthoracic echocardiograms were performed before and after patients received propofol for endoscopic procedures. Post-processing measurements included GLS, 2D (dimensional) ejection fraction (2D EF), and 3D EF. Using paired sample Student's t test, no statistically significant change in GLS, 2D EF, or 3D EF was found despite statistically significant hypotension. In fact, there was a trend toward more negative GLS (improved myocardial function) in patients after receiving propofol.
Conclusion: We found propofol did not cause a reduction in systolic function as measured by GLS, a sensitive measure of myocardial contractility. Therefore, decreases in blood pressure after a propofol bolus in spontaneously breathing patients are likely due to decreased vascular tone and not impaired left ventricular systolic function. These results should be considered in the management of propofol-induced hypotension for spontaneously breathing patients.