临床预防服务:什么时候值得榨汁?

Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005) Pub Date : 2005-08-24

Eileen Salinsky

{"title":"临床预防服务:什么时候值得榨汁?","authors":"Eileen Salinsky","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an overview of clinical preventive services, including a definition of such services and the role of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force in recommending which services should be routinely offered to patients. It also describes efforts to analyze the cost effectiveness of clinical preventive services and reviews the insurance coverage policies of private and public payers. Barriers to increased uptake of appropriate services are discussed, and policy-relevant issues are summarized.","PeriodicalId":87188,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)","volume":" 806","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical preventive services: when is the juice worth the squeeze?\",\"authors\":\"Eileen Salinsky\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides an overview of clinical preventive services, including a definition of such services and the role of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force in recommending which services should be routinely offered to patients. It also describes efforts to analyze the cost effectiveness of clinical preventive services and reviews the insurance coverage policies of private and public payers. Barriers to increased uptake of appropriate services are discussed, and policy-relevant issues are summarized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)\",\"volume\":\" 806\",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文概述了临床预防服务，包括此类服务的定义和美国预防服务工作组在推荐哪些服务应常规提供给患者中的作用。它还描述了分析临床预防服务的成本效益和审查私人和公共支付者的保险覆盖政策的努力。讨论了增加接受适当服务的障碍，并总结了与政策有关的问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

Clinical preventive services: when is the juice worth the squeeze?

This paper provides an overview of clinical preventive services, including a definition of such services and the role of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force in recommending which services should be routinely offered to patients. It also describes efforts to analyze the cost effectiveness of clinical preventive services and reviews the insurance coverage policies of private and public payers. Barriers to increased uptake of appropriate services are discussed, and policy-relevant issues are summarized.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)

自引率

0.00%

发文量