精神卫生保健国家实践准则:联合王国和美国的比较政策分析。

Leigh Ann Simmons, David W Wright
{"title":"精神卫生保健国家实践准则:联合王国和美国的比较政策分析。","authors":"Leigh Ann Simmons,&nbsp;David W Wright","doi":"10.1300/J045v19n02_03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental disorders are the leading cause of disability worldwide, according to the World Health Organization (WHO, 1996). In a report on health indicators of premature death and disability, the World Bank concluded that mental health problems account for 8.1% of the global burden of disease (GBD). Industrialized nations have taken different approaches in applying innovations to mental health care and mental health care policy. This paper uses the K. McInnis-Dittrich model of policy analysis (Ginsberg, 1994) to analyze the approaches of the United Kingdom (U.K.) and the United States (U.S.) to mental health treatment, specifically examining the effects of the U.K.'s national practice guidelines and the U.S.'s lack of similar guidelines. Recommendations for changes in current U.S. mental health policy are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":"19 2","pages":"59-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v19n02_03","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National practice guidelines for mental health care: a comparative policy analysis of the United kingdom and the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Leigh Ann Simmons,&nbsp;David W Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J045v19n02_03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mental disorders are the leading cause of disability worldwide, according to the World Health Organization (WHO, 1996). In a report on health indicators of premature death and disability, the World Bank concluded that mental health problems account for 8.1% of the global burden of disease (GBD). Industrialized nations have taken different approaches in applying innovations to mental health care and mental health care policy. This paper uses the K. McInnis-Dittrich model of policy analysis (Ginsberg, 1994) to analyze the approaches of the United Kingdom (U.K.) and the United States (U.S.) to mental health treatment, specifically examining the effects of the U.K.'s national practice guidelines and the U.S.'s lack of similar guidelines. Recommendations for changes in current U.S. mental health policy are presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"59-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v19n02_03\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v19n02_03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v19n02_03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

根据世界卫生组织(卫生组织,1996年),精神障碍是全世界致残的主要原因。世界银行在一份关于过早死亡和残疾健康指标的报告中得出结论,精神健康问题占全球疾病负担(GBD)的8.1%。工业化国家在将创新应用于精神卫生保健和精神卫生保健政策方面采取了不同的方法。本文使用政策分析的K. McInnis-Dittrich模型(Ginsberg, 1994)分析了英国(U.K.)和美国(U.S.)的心理健康治疗方法,具体考察了英国的效果美国的国家实践指南和美国美国缺乏类似的指导方针。对当前美国心理健康政策的变化提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National practice guidelines for mental health care: a comparative policy analysis of the United kingdom and the United States.

Mental disorders are the leading cause of disability worldwide, according to the World Health Organization (WHO, 1996). In a report on health indicators of premature death and disability, the World Bank concluded that mental health problems account for 8.1% of the global burden of disease (GBD). Industrialized nations have taken different approaches in applying innovations to mental health care and mental health care policy. This paper uses the K. McInnis-Dittrich model of policy analysis (Ginsberg, 1994) to analyze the approaches of the United Kingdom (U.K.) and the United States (U.S.) to mental health treatment, specifically examining the effects of the U.K.'s national practice guidelines and the U.S.'s lack of similar guidelines. Recommendations for changes in current U.S. mental health policy are presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信